Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Maryland left, Rutgers right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Maryland result | Maryland positive share | Maryland negative share | Rutgers result | Rutgers positive share | Rutgers negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 42.3% | 45.4% | W | 49.3% | 35.5% |
| 2025-08-30 | W W | 53.1% | 32.1% | – | 53.6% | 38.1% |
| 2025-09-06 | – | 27.4% | 57.1% | W | 63.6% | 23.2% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 40.6% | 47.2% | W L | 53.8% | 30.8% |
| 2025-09-20 | W | 70.5% | 19.6% | – | 36.2% | 53.3% |
| 2025-09-27 | – | 71.7% | 14.2% | L | 33.9% | 56.6% |
| 2025-10-04 | L | 26% | 68.1% | L | 81.1% | 10% |
| 2025-10-11 | L | 28.9% | 63.1% | – | 27.1% | 60.2% |
| 2025-10-18 | L | 19% | 71.8% | L | 39.4% | 48.4% |
| 2025-10-25 | – | 30.1% | 51.1% | W | 64.5% | 24.6% |
| 2025-11-01 | L | 15.6% | 75.1% | L | 55.1% | 34.8% |
| 2025-11-08 | L | 12.8% | 79.3% | W | 63.1% | 28% |
| 2025-11-15 | L | 17.7% | 72.3% | – | 70.7% | 17.9% |
| 2025-11-22 | L | 21.3% | 66.6% | L | 34.8% | 53% |
| 2025-11-29 | L | 20.1% | 69.3% | L | 34.6% | 53.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 40.2% | 44.6% | – | 69% | 24.1% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 49% | 45% | – | 50% | 0% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 62.2% | 26.5% | – | 66.7% | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 52.6% | 31.2% | – | 16.7% | 50% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 60% | 22.5% | – | 74.1% | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 49.1% | 32.4% | – | 78.3% | 8.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 88% | 3% | – | 70.7% | 18.7% |
“This graphic is terrible.”
“If they lose to Rutgers Locksley stays in New Jersey?”
“Daniel P Surman they sad that when joining the Big10 and when Hobbs started. Go get Franklin to at least put us on the map. This team is a perpetual 6-7 win team.”
“Rutgers is a 2.5 pt favorite. I don’t know how. 😏”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Maryland Harm: 78th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland Identity-Based Abuse: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland Explicit Language: 78th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland College Sports: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland Off-Field Storylines: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland Sports Betting: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Maryland Team & Front Office: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Rutgers Harm: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Rutgers Identity-Based Abuse: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Rutgers Explicit Language: 37th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Rutgers College Sports: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Rutgers Off-Field Storylines: 53rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Rutgers Sports Betting: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Rutgers Team & Front Office: 32nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Maryland's positive share was higher in 5 of 22 shared weeks, Rutgers's in 17.
| Week of | UMD | RUTG | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 42.3% | 49.3% | 703 |
| 2025-08-30 | 53.1% | 53.6% | 641 |
| 2025-09-06 | 27.4% | 63.6% | 788 |
| 2025-09-13 | 40.6% | 53.8% | 1,085 |
| 2025-09-20 | 70.5% | 36.2% | 1,310 |
| 2025-09-27 | 71.7% | 33.9% | 664 |
| 2025-10-04 | 26% | 81.1% | 713 |
| 2025-10-11 | 28.9% | 27.1% | 820 |
| 2025-10-18 | 19% | 39.4% | 841 |
| 2025-10-25 | 30.1% | 64.5% | 824 |
| 2025-11-01 | 15.6% | 55.1% | 1,104 |
| 2025-11-08 | 12.8% | 63.1% | 1,506 |
| 2025-11-15 | 17.7% | 70.7% | 1,006 |
| 2025-11-22 | 21.3% | 34.8% | 780 |
| 2025-11-29 | 20.1% | 34.6% | 1,493 |
| 2025-12-06 | 40.2% | 69% | 141 |
| 2025-12-13 | 49% | 50% | 104 |
| 2025-12-20 | 62.2% | 66.7% | 101 |
| 2025-12-27 | 52.6% | 16.7% | 179 |
| 2026-01-03 | 60% | 74.1% | 147 |
| 2026-01-10 | 49.1% | 78.3% | 131 |
| 2026-01-17 | 88% | 70.7% | 175 |