Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Maryland
Terrapins
vs
Big Ten
Penn State
Nittany Lions
UMD sentiment · 9,607 comments
Positive32.7%
Neutral8.6%
Negative56.5%
Mixed2.2%
PSU sentiment · 57,708 comments
Positive42.5%
Neutral11.8%
Negative44.3%
Mixed1.5%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Maryland
Penn State

Fan Score

326.5
(better)424.9

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

32.7%
(better)42.5%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Maryland
Penn State

Negativity

565.3
(better)442.9

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

50.3
(better)46.5

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

34.7
(better)11.8

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

1.6Race0.3
2.8Gender1.3
0.5LGBTQIA+0.4
0.9Age0.6

Maryland left, Penn State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Maryland
Penn State

Betting talk

4.7
4

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

250.8
199.1

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

23.1
6.3

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Maryland up, Penn State down
Maryland positive ↑Penn State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Maryland had the happier comment section in 7 of 22 shared weeks, Penn State in 15.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Maryland and Penn State
Week ofMaryland resultMaryland positive shareMaryland negative sharePenn State resultPenn State positive sharePenn State negative share
2025-08-2342.3%45.4%56%27.5%
2025-08-30W W53.1%32.1%W41%40.2%
2025-09-0627.4%57.1%W30.7%55.6%
2025-09-13W40.6%47.2%W32%53.6%
2025-09-20W70.5%19.6%37%19.1%
2025-09-2771.7%14.2%L21.4%67.3%
2025-10-04L26%68.1%L16.8%71.7%
2025-10-11L28.9%63.1%L27.7%61.7%
2025-10-18L19%71.8%L33.5%53.4%
2025-10-2530.1%51.1%50.5%39.5%
2025-11-01L15.6%75.1%L39.3%48.7%
2025-11-08L12.8%79.3%L32.9%46.6%
2025-11-15L17.7%72.3%W65.9%25.5%
2025-11-22L21.3%66.6%W74.3%16.5%
2025-11-29L20.1%69.3%W45.5%42.7%
2025-12-0640.2%44.6%60.4%25.5%
2025-12-1349%45%72.8%16.8%
2025-12-2062.2%26.5%68.3%18.6%
2025-12-2752.6%31.2%W69.4%20.9%
2026-01-0360%22.5%58.5%21.8%
2026-01-1049.1%32.4%80.1%9%
2026-01-1788%3%74.2%16.1%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

MarylandPenn State
Harm · UMD +2 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · UMD +36 ptsExplicit Language · UMD +47 ptsCollege Sports · UMD +51 ptsOff-Field Storylines · EvenSports Betting · UMD +14 ptsTeam & Front Office · UMD +11 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Maryland Harm: 78th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland Identity-Based Abuse: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland Explicit Language: 78th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland College Sports: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland Off-Field Storylines: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland Sports Betting: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Maryland Team & Front Office: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Harm: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Identity-Based Abuse: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Explicit Language: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State College Sports: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Off-Field Storylines: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Sports Betting: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Penn State Team & Front Office: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Maryland's positive share was higher in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Penn State's in 14.

UMDPSU
0%44%88%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: UMD, PSU
Week ofUMDPSUComments
2025-08-2342.3%56%1,155
2025-08-3053.1%41%2,185
2025-09-0627.4%30.7%2,963
2025-09-1340.6%32%1,906
2025-09-2070.5%37%2,552
2025-09-2771.7%21.4%6,112
2025-10-0426%16.8%7,757
2025-10-1128.9%27.7%6,065
2025-10-1819%33.5%3,767
2025-10-2530.1%50.5%1,319
2025-11-0115.6%39.3%3,105
2025-11-0812.8%32.9%3,549
2025-11-1517.7%65.9%3,467
2025-11-2221.3%74.3%3,336
2025-11-2920.1%45.5%3,559
2025-12-0640.2%60.4%6,251
2025-12-1349%72.8%1,559
2025-12-2062.2%68.3%1,067
2025-12-2752.6%69.4%4,025
2026-01-0360%58.5%267
2026-01-1049.1%80.1%640
2026-01-1788%74.2%709
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.