Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
Marshall
Thundering Herd
vs
Sun Belt
Southern Miss
Golden Eagles
MRSH sentiment · 7,152 comments
Positive75.1%
Neutral9.7%
Negative14%
Mixed1.1%
USM sentiment · 6,305 comments
Positive73.6%
Neutral10.4%
Negative14.9%
Mixed1%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Marshall
Southern Miss

Fan Score

751.3 (better)
736.4

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

75.1% (better)
73.6%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Marshall
Southern Miss

Negativity

140.4 (better)
149.1

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

10.9 (better)
16.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

8.5
(better)7.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Marshall left, Southern Miss right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Marshall
Southern Miss

Betting talk

2.7
2.4

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

102.3
144.3

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

6
7.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Marshall up, Southern Miss down
Marshall positive ↑Southern Miss positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Marshall had the happier comment section in 9 of 22 shared weeks, Southern Miss in 13.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Marshall and Southern Miss
Week ofMarshall resultMarshall positive shareMarshall negative shareSouthern Miss resultSouthern Miss positive shareSouthern Miss negative share
2025-08-2374.9%11%58%16.5%
2025-08-30L54.1%23.1%L65.9%22%
2025-09-06L58.6%28.2%W73%15.4%
2025-09-13W73.4%16.8%W81.7%9.7%
2025-09-20W93.8%2.1%L60.7%24%
2025-09-27L51.6%33.8%W83%6.7%
2025-10-0465.7%13.9%W80%10.5%
2025-10-11W90.9%4.5%84.8%10.9%
2025-10-18W91.5%3.5%W85%5.6%
2025-10-25L66.6%23.5%W89.3%5.6%
2025-11-0173.1%13.8%77.5%10.8%
2025-11-08L84.6%7.3%W79.8%9.2%
2025-11-15W91.3%3.7%L63.5%28.9%
2025-11-22L57.7%31.9%L64.1%27.1%
2025-11-29L65.1%22.8%L68.9%16.4%
2025-12-0686.1%6.3%63.2%22.7%
2025-12-1388.6%8.9%87.1%7.1%
2025-12-2098.2%0%L75.1%19%
2025-12-2784.9%3.8%75.2%19%
2026-01-0370.6%4.3%83.3%4.2%
2026-01-1064.9%2.7%80%10%
2026-01-1743.9%18.3%65.5%3.4%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

MarshallSouthern Miss
Harm · USM +11 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · MRSH +6 ptsCollege Sports · USM +40 ptsOff-Field Storylines · MRSH +29 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · USM +43 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Marshall Harm: 9th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Marshall Explicit Language: 22nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall College Sports: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall Off-Field Storylines: 35th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Marshall Team & Front Office: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Harm: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Southern Miss Explicit Language: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss College Sports: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Off-Field Storylines: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Southern Miss Team & Front Office: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Marshall's positive share was higher in 10 of 22 shared weeks, Southern Miss's in 12.

MRSHUSM
0%49%98%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: MRSH, USM
Week ofMRSHUSMComments
2025-08-2374.9%58%804
2025-08-3054.1%65.9%1,183
2025-09-0658.6%73%954
2025-09-1373.4%81.7%1,250
2025-09-2093.8%60.7%537
2025-09-2751.6%83%410
2025-10-0465.7%80%471
2025-10-1190.9%84.8%766
2025-10-1891.5%85%1,029
2025-10-2566.6%89.3%791
2025-11-0173.1%77.5%250
2025-11-0884.6%79.8%895
2025-11-1591.3%63.5%780
2025-11-2257.7%64.1%610
2025-11-2965.1%68.9%908
2025-12-0686.1%63.2%655
2025-12-1388.6%87.1%249
2025-12-2098.2%75.1%309
2025-12-2784.9%75.2%211
2026-01-0370.6%83.3%187
2026-01-1064.9%80%97
2026-01-1743.9%65.5%111
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.