Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
Marshall
Thundering Herd
vs
C-USA
Sam Houston
Bearkats
MRSH sentiment · 7,152 comments
Positive75.1%
Neutral9.7%
Negative14%
Mixed1.1%
SHSU sentiment · 2,438 comments
Positive59.3%
Neutral12.5%
Negative26.6%
Mixed1.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Marshall
Sam Houston

Fan Score

751.3 (better)
592.7

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

75.1% (better)
59.3%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Marshall
Sam Houston

Negativity

140.4 (better)
265.8

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

10.9 (better)
11.1

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

8.5 (better)
10.7

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Marshall left, Sam Houston right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Marshall
Sam Houston

Betting talk

2.7
4.1

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

102.3
135.4

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

6
18

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Marshall up, Sam Houston down
Marshall positive ↑Sam Houston positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Marshall had the happier comment section in 12 of 20 shared weeks, Sam Houston in 8.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Marshall and Sam Houston
Week ofMarshall resultMarshall positive shareMarshall negative shareSam Houston resultSam Houston positive shareSam Houston negative share
2025-08-2374.9%11%L L57.7%23.9%
2025-08-30L54.1%23.1%55.6%30.3%
2025-09-06L58.6%28.2%L61%19.1%
2025-09-13W73.4%16.8%67.6%22.1%
2025-09-20W93.8%2.1%L45.3%31.6%
2025-09-27L51.6%33.8%L37.3%51.8%
2025-10-0465.7%13.9%L42.3%39.1%
2025-10-11W90.9%4.5%L39.8%45.3%
2025-10-18W91.5%3.5%59.1%27.3%
2025-10-25L66.6%23.5%L71.4%22.1%
2025-11-0173.1%13.8%37.6%51.5%
2025-11-08L84.6%7.3%W84.8%6.3%
2025-11-15W91.3%3.7%W84.6%4.7%
2025-11-22L57.7%31.9%L63.4%22.6%
2025-11-29L65.1%22.8%L73.4%15.7%
2025-12-0686.1%6.3%93.3%0%
2025-12-1388.6%8.9%33.3%0%
2025-12-2098.2%0%100%0%
2025-12-2784.9%3.8%40%20%
2026-01-0370.6%4.3%
2026-01-1064.9%2.7%95.8%1.4%
2026-01-1743.9%18.3%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

MarshallSam Houston
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · SHSU +5 ptsCollege Sports · SHSU +63 ptsOff-Field Storylines · SHSU +63 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · SHSU +39 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Marshall Harm: 9th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Marshall Explicit Language: 22nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall College Sports: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall Off-Field Storylines: 35th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Marshall Team & Front Office: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Sam Houston Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Sam Houston Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Sam Houston Explicit Language: 27th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Sam Houston College Sports: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Sam Houston Off-Field Storylines: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Sam Houston Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Sam Houston Team & Front Office: 64th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Marshall's positive share was higher in 11 of 20 shared weeks, Sam Houston's in 9.

MRSHSHSU
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: MRSH, SHSU
Week ofMRSHSHSUComments
2025-08-2374.9%57.7%405
2025-08-3054.1%55.6%721
2025-09-0658.6%61%530
2025-09-1373.4%67.6%887
2025-09-2093.8%45.3%626
2025-09-2751.6%37.3%267
2025-10-0465.7%42.3%419
2025-10-1190.9%39.8%743
2025-10-1891.5%59.1%732
2025-10-2566.6%71.4%418
2025-11-0173.1%37.6%324
2025-11-0884.6%84.8%633
2025-11-1591.3%84.6%770
2025-11-2257.7%63.4%419
2025-11-2965.1%73.4%999
2025-12-0686.1%93.3%94
2025-12-1388.6%33.3%82
2025-12-2098.2%100%57
2025-12-2784.9%40%111
2026-01-0370.6%0%163
2026-01-1064.9%95.8%108
2026-01-1743.9%0%82
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.