Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
Marshall
Thundering Herd
vs
MAC
Ohio
Bobcats
MRSH sentiment · 7,152 comments
Positive75.1%
Neutral9.7%
Negative14%
Mixed1.1%
OHIO sentiment · 5,814 comments
Positive76.8%
Neutral9.8%
Negative12.1%
Mixed1.3%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Marshall
Ohio

Fan Score

751.3
(better)768.5

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

75.1%
(better)76.8%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Marshall
Ohio

Negativity

140.4
(better)120.7

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

10.9 (better)
13.4

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

8.5 (better)
10.7

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.1Race0.2
0.1Gender0.3
0.1LGBTQIA+0.7
0.7Age0.2

Marshall left, Ohio right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Marshall
Ohio

Betting talk

2.7
3.4

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

102.3
91.2

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

6
1.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Marshall up, Ohio down
Marshall positive ↑Ohio positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Marshall had the happier comment section in 9 of 22 shared weeks, Ohio in 13.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Marshall and Ohio
Week ofMarshall resultMarshall positive shareMarshall negative shareOhio resultOhio positive shareOhio negative share
2025-08-2374.9%11%L76.1%17%
2025-08-30L54.1%23.1%58.2%23.6%
2025-09-06L58.6%28.2%W61.7%17.8%
2025-09-13W73.4%16.8%L72.5%14.4%
2025-09-20W93.8%2.1%W83.6%1.8%
2025-09-27L51.6%33.8%W90%2.4%
2025-10-0465.7%13.9%L38.8%53.9%
2025-10-11W90.9%4.5%88.6%2.5%
2025-10-18W91.5%3.5%W92.3%0.9%
2025-10-25L66.6%23.5%W88.7%4.8%
2025-11-0173.1%13.8%W89.1%4.4%
2025-11-08L84.6%7.3%L60.4%29.7%
2025-11-15W91.3%3.7%W84%6.6%
2025-11-22L57.7%31.9%W89.3%2.6%
2025-11-29L65.1%22.8%90.8%1.3%
2025-12-0686.1%6.3%87.7%3.8%
2025-12-1388.6%8.9%83.7%5.8%
2025-12-2098.2%0%W88.6%6.2%
2025-12-2784.9%3.8%88%6%
2026-01-0370.6%4.3%76.3%16.7%
2026-01-1064.9%2.7%97.8%2.2%
2026-01-1743.9%18.3%100%0%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

MarshallOhio
Harm · OHIO +5 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · OHIO +5 ptsCollege Sports · OHIO +10 ptsOff-Field Storylines · OHIO +2 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · MRSH +6 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Marshall Harm: 9th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Marshall Explicit Language: 22nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall College Sports: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall Off-Field Storylines: 35th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Marshall Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Marshall Team & Front Office: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ohio Harm: 14th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ohio Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Ohio Explicit Language: 27th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ohio College Sports: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ohio Off-Field Storylines: 37th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ohio Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Ohio Team & Front Office: 19th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Marshall's positive share was higher in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Ohio's in 14.

MRSHOHIO
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: MRSH, OHIO
Week ofMRSHOHIOComments
2025-08-2374.9%76.1%569
2025-08-3054.1%58.2%1,041
2025-09-0658.6%61.7%1,447
2025-09-1373.4%72.5%1,244
2025-09-2093.8%83.6%512
2025-09-2751.6%90%368
2025-10-0465.7%38.8%318
2025-10-1190.9%88.6%661
2025-10-1891.5%92.3%930
2025-10-2566.6%88.7%527
2025-11-0173.1%89.1%562
2025-11-0884.6%60.4%618
2025-11-1591.3%84%878
2025-11-2257.7%89.3%522
2025-11-2965.1%90.8%965
2025-12-0686.1%87.7%209
2025-12-1388.6%83.7%183
2025-12-2098.2%88.6%802
2025-12-2784.9%88%156
2026-01-0370.6%76.3%277
2026-01-1064.9%97.8%82
2026-01-1743.9%100%95
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.