Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Marshall left, Middle Tennessee right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Marshall result | Marshall positive share | Marshall negative share | Middle Tennessee result | Middle Tennessee positive share | Middle Tennessee negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 74.9% | 11% | – | 71.9% | 0% |
| 2025-08-30 | L | 54.1% | 23.1% | L | 36.3% | 53.9% |
| 2025-09-06 | L | 58.6% | 28.2% | L | 82.2% | 12.6% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 73.4% | 16.8% | W | 89.7% | 6.3% |
| 2025-09-20 | W | 93.8% | 2.1% | L | 69.3% | 26.6% |
| 2025-09-27 | L | 51.6% | 33.8% | L | 39.8% | 49.7% |
| 2025-10-04 | – | 65.7% | 13.9% | L | 49.7% | 43.3% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 90.9% | 4.5% | – | 82.1% | 12.5% |
| 2025-10-18 | W | 91.5% | 3.5% | L | 45.6% | 45.1% |
| 2025-10-25 | L | 66.6% | 23.5% | L | 42.3% | 44% |
| 2025-11-01 | – | 73.1% | 13.8% | – | 71.9% | 18.8% |
| 2025-11-08 | L | 84.6% | 7.3% | L | 28.1% | 63.2% |
| 2025-11-15 | W | 91.3% | 3.7% | L | 52.7% | 39.2% |
| 2025-11-22 | L | 57.7% | 31.9% | W | 80.5% | 15.4% |
| 2025-11-29 | L | 65.1% | 22.8% | W | 90.5% | 7.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 86.1% | 6.3% | – | 66.7% | 13.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 88.6% | 8.9% | – | 96% | 4% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 98.2% | 0% | – | 92% | 8% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 84.9% | 3.8% | – | 87.5% | 12.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 70.6% | 4.3% | – | 100% | 0% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 64.9% | 2.7% | – | 89.5% | 2.6% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 43.9% | 18.3% | – | 96.2% | 0% |
“Televised? If so, what channel?”
“My wife and I will be there!! Looking forward to it!”
“Someone need to get a shot of a player in the video truck”
“Good luck Coach Mason and the MTSU Blue Raiders 💙 let's get this win!!!! #39”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Marshall Harm: 9th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Marshall Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Marshall Explicit Language: 22nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Marshall College Sports: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Marshall Off-Field Storylines: 35th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Marshall Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Marshall Team & Front Office: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Middle Tennessee Harm: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Middle Tennessee Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Middle Tennessee Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
- Middle Tennessee College Sports: 85th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Middle Tennessee Off-Field Storylines: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Middle Tennessee Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Middle Tennessee Team & Front Office: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Marshall's positive share was higher in 13 of 22 shared weeks, Middle Tennessee's in 9.
| Week of | MRSH | MTSU | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 74.9% | 71.9% | 320 |
| 2025-08-30 | 54.1% | 36.3% | 1,100 |
| 2025-09-06 | 58.6% | 82.2% | 568 |
| 2025-09-13 | 73.4% | 89.7% | 1,071 |
| 2025-09-20 | 93.8% | 69.3% | 533 |
| 2025-09-27 | 51.6% | 39.8% | 328 |
| 2025-10-04 | 65.7% | 49.7% | 353 |
| 2025-10-11 | 90.9% | 82.1% | 638 |
| 2025-10-18 | 91.5% | 45.6% | 892 |
| 2025-10-25 | 66.6% | 42.3% | 523 |
| 2025-11-01 | 73.1% | 71.9% | 162 |
| 2025-11-08 | 84.6% | 28.1% | 567 |
| 2025-11-15 | 91.3% | 52.7% | 807 |
| 2025-11-22 | 57.7% | 80.5% | 547 |
| 2025-11-29 | 65.1% | 90.5% | 946 |
| 2025-12-06 | 86.1% | 66.7% | 139 |
| 2025-12-13 | 88.6% | 96% | 104 |
| 2025-12-20 | 98.2% | 92% | 81 |
| 2025-12-27 | 84.9% | 87.5% | 114 |
| 2026-01-03 | 70.6% | 100% | 174 |
| 2026-01-10 | 64.9% | 89.5% | 75 |
| 2026-01-17 | 43.9% | 96.2% | 108 |