Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
LSU left, South Carolina right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | LSU result | LSU positive share | LSU negative share | South Carolina result | South Carolina positive share | South Carolina negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 73.2% | 11.6% | – | 67.1% | 14% |
| 2025-08-30 | W | 61.7% | 27% | W | 69.6% | 17% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 49.8% | 33.7% | W | 48.8% | 32.5% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 49.5% | 37.6% | L | 43.1% | 44% |
| 2025-09-20 | W | 56.2% | 29.8% | L | 35.5% | 54.3% |
| 2025-09-27 | L | 19.3% | 71.4% | W | 61.7% | 28.2% |
| 2025-10-04 | – | 48.8% | 34.7% | – | 76.5% | 9.1% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 46.4% | 41.9% | L | 35.9% | 54.8% |
| 2025-10-18 | L | 24.7% | 64.5% | L | 28.4% | 61.3% |
| 2025-10-25 | L | 31.5% | 56.8% | L | 44.5% | 46.5% |
| 2025-11-01 | – | 55% | 28.9% | L | 31.5% | 59.4% |
| 2025-11-08 | L | 38.9% | 51% | – | 49.2% | 20.8% |
| 2025-11-15 | W | 73.9% | 17.7% | L | 26% | 64.1% |
| 2025-11-22 | W | 46.4% | 43% | W | 55.2% | 30.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | L | 31% | 56.9% | L | 44.3% | 46% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 48% | 33% | – | 40.4% | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 64.2% | 25.1% | – | 60.3% | 30.4% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 53% | 33.7% | – | 49.3% | 35.2% |
| 2025-12-27 | L | 35% | 51.5% | – | 49.1% | 28.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 51.1% | 36.2% | – | 61.1% | 24.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 65.3% | 20.7% | – | 60.7% | 25.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 46.6% | 34.6% | – | 64.9% | 22% |
“Better be ready to make up for the past few games~ focus, play hard both offense and defense all 4 quarters and coaches please coach~ let’s Geaux TIGERS!!!”
“Better pay the refs off again to call bs plays to keep them in it. lol 😝”
“Gamecock fans, if you making the trip come early. Our tailgates are legendary and we will feed you. Safe travels”
“Give the damn ball to Augustave....”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- LSU Harm: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- LSU Identity-Based Abuse: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- LSU Explicit Language: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- LSU College Sports: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- LSU Off-Field Storylines: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- LSU Sports Betting: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- LSU Team & Front Office: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Harm: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Identity-Based Abuse: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Explicit Language: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina College Sports: 45th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Off-Field Storylines: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Sports Betting: 5th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- South Carolina Team & Front Office: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. LSU's positive share was higher in 11 of 22 shared weeks, South Carolina's in 11.
| Week of | LSU | SCAR | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 73.2% | 67.1% | 2,915 |
| 2025-08-30 | 61.7% | 69.6% | 11,901 |
| 2025-09-06 | 49.8% | 48.8% | 5,188 |
| 2025-09-13 | 49.5% | 43.1% | 5,828 |
| 2025-09-20 | 56.2% | 35.5% | 4,112 |
| 2025-09-27 | 19.3% | 61.7% | 8,130 |
| 2025-10-04 | 48.8% | 76.5% | 1,840 |
| 2025-10-11 | 46.4% | 35.9% | 5,030 |
| 2025-10-18 | 24.7% | 28.4% | 10,145 |
| 2025-10-25 | 31.5% | 44.5% | 8,522 |
| 2025-11-01 | 55% | 31.5% | 1,541 |
| 2025-11-08 | 38.9% | 49.2% | 3,465 |
| 2025-11-15 | 73.9% | 26% | 7,040 |
| 2025-11-22 | 46.4% | 55.2% | 5,370 |
| 2025-11-29 | 31% | 44.3% | 18,883 |
| 2025-12-06 | 48% | 40.4% | 5,465 |
| 2025-12-13 | 64.2% | 60.3% | 1,613 |
| 2025-12-20 | 53% | 49.3% | 1,374 |
| 2025-12-27 | 35% | 49.1% | 4,293 |
| 2026-01-03 | 51.1% | 61.1% | 912 |
| 2026-01-10 | 65.3% | 60.7% | 1,354 |
| 2026-01-17 | 46.6% | 64.9% | 301 |