Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
Louisiana
Ragin' Cajuns
vs
C-USA
Louisiana Tech
Bulldogs
UL sentiment · 4,213 comments
Positive68.8%
Neutral8.5%
Negative21.7%
Mixed1%
LT sentiment · 4,799 comments
Positive66.2%
Neutral8.2%
Negative24.4%
Mixed1.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Louisiana
Louisiana Tech

Fan Score

687.6 (better)
662

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

68.8% (better)
66.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Louisiana
Louisiana Tech

Negativity

217.2 (better)
243.8

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

10.2 (better)
26

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

3.1 (better)
15.8

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Louisiana left, Louisiana Tech right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Louisiana
Louisiana Tech

Betting talk

2.6
2.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

106.3
120.2

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.5
6.9

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Louisiana up, Louisiana Tech down
Louisiana positive ↑Louisiana Tech positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Louisiana had the happier comment section in 10 of 22 shared weeks, Louisiana Tech in 11.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Louisiana and Louisiana Tech
Week ofLouisiana resultLouisiana positive shareLouisiana negative shareLouisiana Tech resultLouisiana Tech positive shareLouisiana Tech negative share
2025-08-2375%5%87.1%6.5%
2025-08-30L40.9%42.8%W66.7%22%
2025-09-06W73.7%15%L66.7%25.2%
2025-09-13L63.6%26.3%W87.9%2.6%
2025-09-20L42.1%46%W84.4%4.6%
2025-09-27W84.1%9.1%W93.1%2.8%
2025-10-0496.2%0%L35.1%53.2%
2025-10-11L56.1%33.3%48.6%31.4%
2025-10-18L35.3%50.9%L36.7%52.9%
2025-10-25L38.8%53.1%W62.9%17.7%
2025-11-01W83.4%6.7%90.4%6.2%
2025-11-08W74.7%17%L34.3%59.4%
2025-11-15W89.1%4%L45.5%47.5%
2025-11-2294.7%0%W74.3%15.8%
2025-11-29W87.4%7.9%W87.1%3.8%
2025-12-0670.6%15.2%71.1%10.7%
2025-12-13L49.9%40.8%82.1%10.7%
2025-12-2075%10%82.7%6.2%
2025-12-27100%0%W65%24.7%
2026-01-03100%0%83%6.4%
2026-01-1088%4%68.2%13.6%
2026-01-17100%0%100%0%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

LouisianaLouisiana Tech
Harm · LT +40 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · LT +30 ptsOff-Field Storylines · LT +39 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · LT +14 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Louisiana Harm: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Louisiana Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Louisiana College Sports: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Off-Field Storylines: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Louisiana Team & Front Office: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Tech Harm: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Tech Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Louisiana Tech Explicit Language: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Tech College Sports: 58th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Tech Off-Field Storylines: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Louisiana Tech Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Louisiana Tech Team & Front Office: 45th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Louisiana's positive share was higher in 10 of 22 shared weeks, Louisiana Tech's in 11.

ULLT
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: UL, LT
Week ofULLTComments
2025-08-2375%87.1%142
2025-08-3040.9%66.7%779
2025-09-0673.7%66.7%778
2025-09-1363.6%87.9%308
2025-09-2042.1%84.4%420
2025-09-2784.1%93.1%644
2025-10-0496.2%35.1%275
2025-10-1156.1%48.6%158
2025-10-1835.3%36.7%549
2025-10-2538.8%62.9%209
2025-11-0183.4%90.4%339
2025-11-0874.7%34.3%529
2025-11-1589.1%45.5%566
2025-11-2294.7%74.3%442
2025-11-2987.4%87.1%1,182
2025-12-0670.6%71.1%325
2025-12-1349.9%82.1%465
2025-12-2075%82.7%101
2025-12-27100%65%681
2026-01-03100%83%53
2026-01-1088%68.2%47
2026-01-17100%100%20
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.