Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

SEC
Kentucky
Wildcats
vs
C-USA
WKU
Hilltoppers
UK sentiment · 19,024 comments
Positive52.2%
Neutral8%
Negative37.6%
Mixed2.1%
WKU sentiment · 2,689 comments
Positive82.2%
Neutral8%
Negative8.6%
Mixed1.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Kentucky
WKU

Fan Score

522.4
(better)822.2

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

52.2%
(better)82.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Kentucky
WKU

Negativity

376.1
(better)85.5

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

44.4
(better)5.2

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

30.1
(better)1.5

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Kentucky left, WKU right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Kentucky
WKU

Betting talk

2.9
3.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

202.9
38.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

11.1
4.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Kentucky up, WKU down
Kentucky positive ↑WKU positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Kentucky had the happier comment section in 1 of 22 shared weeks, WKU in 21.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Kentucky and WKU
Week ofKentucky resultKentucky positive shareKentucky negative shareWKU resultWKU positive shareWKU negative share
2025-08-2361.3%30.6%W81.5%7.1%
2025-08-30W55.4%36.1%W84.5%3.3%
2025-09-06L52.1%39.1%L60.6%22.7%
2025-09-13W64.6%26.5%68.2%13.6%
2025-09-2066.7%25.7%W89.5%0%
2025-09-27L26.6%62.2%W W86.1%5.7%
2025-10-04L31.4%56.5%84.8%8.4%
2025-10-1142.2%47.5%L37.5%43.3%
2025-10-18L23.8%65%W85.1%6.9%
2025-10-25L34.9%54.7%90%0%
2025-11-01W62.4%28.2%W98.6%0%
2025-11-08W71.6%18.1%72.7%3%
2025-11-15W66.1%23.8%W73.9%9.9%
2025-11-22L37.8%52.4%L73.8%17.3%
2025-11-29L51.1%38.1%L81.1%9.8%
2025-12-0663.2%28.4%88.3%5.3%
2025-12-1360.9%25.9%100%0%
2025-12-2065.6%24.2%W90.3%3.6%
2025-12-2759.3%23.7%92.1%0%
2026-01-0382.3%11.9%87.5%12.5%
2026-01-1069.8%20.2%87.5%0%
2026-01-1776.8%17.1%100%0%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

KentuckyWKU
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · UK +25 ptsOff-Field Storylines · WKU +4 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · UK +91 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Kentucky Harm: 74th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kentucky Identity-Based Abuse: 50th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kentucky Explicit Language: 71st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kentucky College Sports: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kentucky Off-Field Storylines: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kentucky Sports Betting: 44th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kentucky Team & Front Office: 92nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Off-Field Storylines: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Team & Front Office: 1st percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Kentucky's positive share was higher in 1 of 22 shared weeks, WKU's in 21.

UKWKU
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: UK, WKU
Week ofUKWKUComments
2025-08-2361.3%81.5%688
2025-08-3055.4%84.5%1,083
2025-09-0652.1%60.6%890
2025-09-1364.6%68.2%618
2025-09-2066.7%89.5%455
2025-09-2726.6%86.1%1,068
2025-10-0431.4%84.8%859
2025-10-1142.2%37.5%386
2025-10-1823.8%85.1%1,476
2025-10-2534.9%90%894
2025-11-0162.4%98.6%1,221
2025-11-0871.6%72.7%1,455
2025-11-1566.1%73.9%934
2025-11-2237.8%73.8%929
2025-11-2951.1%81.1%5,456
2025-12-0663.2%88.3%885
2025-12-1360.9%100%563
2025-12-2065.6%90.3%737
2025-12-2759.3%92.1%97
2026-01-0382.3%87.5%327
2026-01-1069.8%87.5%605
2026-01-1776.8%100%87
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.