Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

C-USA
Kennesaw State
Owls
vs
C-USA
WKU
Hilltoppers
KENN sentiment · 4,281 comments
Positive87.4%
Neutral6.2%
Negative5.7%
Mixed0.7%
WKU sentiment · 2,689 comments
Positive82.2%
Neutral8%
Negative8.6%
Mixed1.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Kennesaw State
WKU

Fan Score

874.3 (better)
822.2

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

87.4% (better)
82.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Kennesaw State
WKU

Negativity

56.8 (better)
85.5

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

8.9
(better)5.2

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

3.7
(better)1.5

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Kennesaw State left, WKU right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Kennesaw State
WKU

Betting talk

0.5
3.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

69.1
38.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

1.4
4.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Kennesaw State up, WKU down
Kennesaw State positive ↑WKU positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Kennesaw State had the happier comment section in 14 of 22 shared weeks, WKU in 7.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Kennesaw State and WKU
Week ofKennesaw State resultKennesaw State positive shareKennesaw State negative shareWKU resultWKU positive shareWKU negative share
2025-08-23L83.2%1.3%W81.5%7.1%
2025-08-3077%12.9%W84.5%3.3%
2025-09-06L72.7%11.7%L60.6%22.7%
2025-09-13W87.3%4.9%68.2%13.6%
2025-09-20W97.2%2.1%W89.5%0%
2025-09-27W93.5%3.7%W W86.1%5.7%
2025-10-04W92.4%0.8%84.8%8.4%
2025-10-1189%1.4%L37.5%43.3%
2025-10-18W90.4%2.2%W85.1%6.9%
2025-10-25W82.6%7.7%90%0%
2025-11-0192.2%2%W98.6%0%
2025-11-08W90.1%2.9%72.7%3%
2025-11-15L88.5%7.7%W73.9%9.9%
2025-11-22W91.1%4.2%L73.8%17.3%
2025-11-29W W91.4%3.5%L81.1%9.8%
2025-12-0688.7%4.9%88.3%5.3%
2025-12-13L78.7%13.1%100%0%
2025-12-2084.1%10.2%W90.3%3.6%
2025-12-2775%25%92.1%0%
2026-01-03100%0%87.5%12.5%
2026-01-1085.7%6.1%87.5%0%
2026-01-17100%0%100%0%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Kennesaw StateWKU
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · WKU +15 ptsOff-Field Storylines · KENN +29 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · KENN +5 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Kennesaw State Harm: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State College Sports: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Off-Field Storylines: 39th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State Team & Front Office: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Off-Field Storylines: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Team & Front Office: 1st percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Kennesaw State's positive share was higher in 14 of 22 shared weeks, WKU's in 7.

KENNWKU
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: KENN, WKU
Week ofKENNWKUComments
2025-08-2383.2%81.5%317
2025-08-3077%84.5%320
2025-09-0672.7%60.6%194
2025-09-1387.3%68.2%124
2025-09-2097.2%89.5%231
2025-09-2793.5%86.1%266
2025-10-0492.4%84.8%309
2025-10-1189%37.5%177
2025-10-1890.4%85.1%366
2025-10-2582.6%90%267
2025-11-0192.2%98.6%175
2025-11-0890.1%72.7%204
2025-11-1588.5%73.9%344
2025-11-2291.1%73.8%550
2025-11-2991.4%81.1%734
2025-12-0688.7%88.3%1,032
2025-12-1378.7%100%461
2025-12-2084.1%90.3%737
2025-12-2775%92.1%42
2026-01-03100%87.5%34
2026-01-1085.7%87.5%65
2026-01-17100%100%21
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.