Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Kansas left, West Virginia right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Kansas result | Kansas positive share | Kansas negative share | West Virginia result | West Virginia positive share | West Virginia negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | W W | 64.5% | 22.1% | – | 53.5% | 28% |
| 2025-08-30 | – | 43.7% | 35.2% | W | 55.9% | 30.4% |
| 2025-09-06 | L | 38.8% | 48.8% | L | 22% | 66.7% |
| 2025-09-13 | – | 40.1% | 24.1% | W | 67.3% | 21.1% |
| 2025-09-20 | W | 65.8% | 18.3% | L | 33.8% | 55.8% |
| 2025-09-27 | L | 29.2% | 57.4% | L L | 34.5% | 55.2% |
| 2025-10-04 | W | 73.6% | 17.7% | – | 36% | 52.8% |
| 2025-10-11 | L | 32.9% | 55.2% | – | 57.5% | 27.6% |
| 2025-10-18 | – | 49.4% | 17.5% | L | 27.6% | 61.3% |
| 2025-10-25 | L | 20.5% | 68.8% | L | 50.1% | 34.9% |
| 2025-11-01 | W | 46.8% | 37.5% | W | 78.3% | 14.2% |
| 2025-11-08 | L | 24% | 65.5% | W | 79.3% | 11.3% |
| 2025-11-15 | – | 64.4% | 24.1% | L | 49.9% | 40.9% |
| 2025-11-22 | L L | 28.7% | 61.9% | – | 71.6% | 11.8% |
| 2025-11-29 | – | 57.2% | 34.2% | L | 53.8% | 37.2% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 55.6% | 33.9% | – | 70% | 18.8% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 50% | 34% | – | 86.1% | 5.6% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 45.5% | 36.4% | – | 93.2% | 2.3% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 70.9% | 18.8% | – | 80.2% | 6.9% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 52.4% | 36.9% | – | 76.7% | 9.9% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 50% | 10% | – | 80.1% | 8.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 35.6% | 31.7% | – | 55.8% | 29.2% |
“The best part is seeing Kansas fans disappointed at a watch party after thinking they were really about to win.”
“You're in Lawrence, it's Saturday and 5:00 why wouldn't you go to the game?? Be the hottest event in town!!! KU will win. They're a very good team. They're a bowl team!!!”
“Let’s Go !!! Get the Jayhawks out of the way with dub!!”
“Brett M. White you’re right. Rome WAS built in a day. Can’t believe Rich Rod hasn’t won the 2026 national championship already. Ridiculous. Probably should fire him and get a new coach.”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Kansas Harm: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Kansas Identity-Based Abuse: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Kansas Explicit Language: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Kansas College Sports: 34th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Kansas Off-Field Storylines: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Kansas Sports Betting: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Kansas Team & Front Office: 62nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- West Virginia Harm: 72nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- West Virginia Identity-Based Abuse: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- West Virginia Explicit Language: 52nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- West Virginia College Sports: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- West Virginia Off-Field Storylines: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- West Virginia Sports Betting: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- West Virginia Team & Front Office: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Kansas's positive share was higher in 7 of 22 shared weeks, West Virginia's in 15.
| Week of | KU | WVU | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 64.5% | 53.5% | 1,982 |
| 2025-08-30 | 43.7% | 55.9% | 2,767 |
| 2025-09-06 | 38.8% | 22% | 5,026 |
| 2025-09-13 | 40.1% | 67.3% | 4,170 |
| 2025-09-20 | 65.8% | 33.8% | 2,320 |
| 2025-09-27 | 29.2% | 34.5% | 2,857 |
| 2025-10-04 | 73.6% | 36% | 1,728 |
| 2025-10-11 | 32.9% | 57.5% | 1,146 |
| 2025-10-18 | 49.4% | 27.6% | 2,029 |
| 2025-10-25 | 20.5% | 50.1% | 2,120 |
| 2025-11-01 | 46.8% | 78.3% | 3,074 |
| 2025-11-08 | 24% | 79.3% | 2,036 |
| 2025-11-15 | 64.4% | 49.9% | 1,181 |
| 2025-11-22 | 28.7% | 71.6% | 1,371 |
| 2025-11-29 | 57.2% | 53.8% | 2,709 |
| 2025-12-06 | 55.6% | 70% | 610 |
| 2025-12-13 | 50% | 86.1% | 244 |
| 2025-12-20 | 45.5% | 93.2% | 233 |
| 2025-12-27 | 70.9% | 80.2% | 608 |
| 2026-01-03 | 52.4% | 76.7% | 337 |
| 2026-01-10 | 50% | 80.1% | 468 |
| 2026-01-17 | 35.6% | 55.8% | 464 |