Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
James Madison left, Texas State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | James Madison result | James Madison positive share | James Madison negative share | Texas State result | Texas State positive share | Texas State negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 88.7% | 4.2% | – | 76.9% | 0% |
| 2025-08-30 | W L | 83.6% | 7.9% | W | 77.1% | 1.4% |
| 2025-09-06 | – | 22.3% | 65.5% | W | 89.3% | 2.8% |
| 2025-09-13 | – | 64.3% | 17.1% | L | 69.6% | 18.8% |
| 2025-09-20 | W | 79.8% | 11.6% | W | 77.4% | 7.5% |
| 2025-09-27 | W | 92.3% | 5.3% | – | 60% | 0% |
| 2025-10-04 | W | 61.7% | 27.1% | L | 37.4% | 52.8% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 68.8% | 22% | L | 33.6% | 55.5% |
| 2025-10-18 | W | 90.2% | 7.5% | L | 32.9% | 55.9% |
| 2025-10-25 | W | 83.9% | 9% | L | 42.4% | 50.5% |
| 2025-11-01 | – | 86.6% | 5.7% | – | 60% | 28% |
| 2025-11-08 | W | 84.6% | 8.9% | L | 34% | 60.6% |
| 2025-11-15 | W | 83.2% | 7.3% | W | 84.3% | 9.6% |
| 2025-11-22 | W | 80.4% | 11.3% | W | 88.7% | 1.6% |
| 2025-11-29 | W W | 80% | 12.6% | W | 88.1% | 2% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 63.1% | 27.3% | – | 100% | 0% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 70.7% | 20.7% | – | 83.3% | 0% |
| 2025-12-20 | L | 58.6% | 32.5% | – | 87.5% | 0% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 77% | 17.8% | W | 77.9% | 11.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 93.8% | 3.6% | – | 90.7% | 4% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 67.5% | 24% | – | – | – |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 80.1% | 14% | – | 83.1% | 6% |
“Praying for a good game and no injuries”
“Has anyone been to Marshall before for a game and have any info on where to park? Thanks in advance.”
“Offense under so much pressure to keep up because the DC can’t scheme or coach to save them the trouble.”
“Why won’t they Fire the D Coordinator?”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- James Madison Harm: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- James Madison Identity-Based Abuse: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- James Madison Explicit Language: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- James Madison College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- James Madison Off-Field Storylines: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- James Madison Sports Betting: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- James Madison Team & Front Office: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas State Harm: low volume, not ranked
- Texas State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Texas State Explicit Language: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas State College Sports: 52nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas State Off-Field Storylines: 45th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Texas State Team & Front Office: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. James Madison's positive share was higher in 11 of 21 shared weeks, Texas State's in 10.
| Week of | JMU | TXST | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 88.7% | 76.9% | 155 |
| 2025-08-30 | 83.6% | 77.1% | 514 |
| 2025-09-06 | 22.3% | 89.3% | 906 |
| 2025-09-13 | 64.3% | 69.6% | 182 |
| 2025-09-20 | 79.8% | 77.4% | 335 |
| 2025-09-27 | 92.3% | 60% | 179 |
| 2025-10-04 | 61.7% | 37.4% | 444 |
| 2025-10-11 | 68.8% | 33.6% | 478 |
| 2025-10-18 | 90.2% | 32.9% | 612 |
| 2025-10-25 | 83.9% | 42.4% | 608 |
| 2025-11-01 | 86.6% | 60% | 244 |
| 2025-11-08 | 84.6% | 34% | 568 |
| 2025-11-15 | 83.2% | 84.3% | 664 |
| 2025-11-22 | 80.4% | 88.7% | 939 |
| 2025-11-29 | 80% | 88.1% | 1,636 |
| 2025-12-06 | 63.1% | 100% | 4,411 |
| 2025-12-13 | 70.7% | 83.3% | 1,868 |
| 2025-12-20 | 58.6% | 87.5% | 2,994 |
| 2025-12-27 | 77% | 77.9% | 424 |
| 2026-01-03 | 93.8% | 90.7% | 379 |
| 2026-01-10 | 67.5% | 0% | 467 |
| 2026-01-17 | 80.1% | 83.1% | 219 |