Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
James Madison
Dukes
vs
FCS
North Dakota State
Bison
JMU sentiment · 16,981 comments
Positive69.5%
Neutral6.7%
Negative22%
Mixed1.8%
NDSU sentiment · 4,131 comments
Positive73.8%
Neutral9.3%
Negative15.9%
Mixed1%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

James Madison
North Dakota State

Fan Score

695
(better)737.6

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

69.5%
(better)73.8%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

James Madison
North Dakota State

Negativity

220.2
(better)159

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

24.3
(better)19.4

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

4.9 (better)
13.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

James Madison left, North Dakota State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

James Madison
North Dakota State

Betting talk

5.8
0

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

121.1
83.8

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

5.2
2.2

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: James Madison up, North Dakota State down
James Madison positive ↑North Dakota State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
James Madison had the happier comment section in 13 of 22 shared weeks, North Dakota State in 9.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for James Madison and North Dakota State
Week ofJames Madison resultJames Madison positive shareJames Madison negative shareNorth Dakota State resultNorth Dakota State positive shareNorth Dakota State negative share
2025-08-2388.7%4.2%54.8%26%
2025-08-30W L83.6%7.9%W78.3%7.8%
2025-09-0622.3%65.5%W61.1%16.7%
2025-09-1364.3%17.1%W60.8%22.2%
2025-09-20W79.8%11.6%61.8%8.8%
2025-09-27W92.3%5.3%W83.3%5.1%
2025-10-04W61.7%27.1%W71.3%14.7%
2025-10-11W68.8%22%W79.2%12.3%
2025-10-18W90.2%7.5%W81.7%3.5%
2025-10-25W83.9%9%W80.6%13.7%
2025-11-0186.6%5.7%W79.9%8.2%
2025-11-08W84.6%8.9%W71.6%21.3%
2025-11-15W83.2%7.3%W92.1%3.3%
2025-11-22W80.4%11.3%W74.7%13.8%
2025-11-29W W80%12.6%81.7%10.9%
2025-12-0663.1%27.3%L46.8%40.6%
2025-12-1370.7%20.7%80.6%14.4%
2025-12-20L58.6%32.5%89.1%6.5%
2025-12-2777%17.8%81.1%13.5%
2026-01-0393.8%3.6%81.8%9.1%
2026-01-1067.5%24%25%58.3%
2026-01-1780.1%14%89.7%5.1%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

James MadisonNorth Dakota State
Harm · JMU +15 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · NDSU +29 ptsCollege Sports · JMU +10 ptsOff-Field Storylines · NDSU +69 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · JMU +35 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • James Madison Harm: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Identity-Based Abuse: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Explicit Language: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Off-Field Storylines: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Sports Betting: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Team & Front Office: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • North Dakota State Harm: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • North Dakota State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • North Dakota State Explicit Language: 35th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • North Dakota State College Sports: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • North Dakota State Off-Field Storylines: 82nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • North Dakota State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • North Dakota State Team & Front Office: 12th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. James Madison's positive share was higher in 13 of 22 shared weeks, North Dakota State's in 9.

JMUNDSU
0%47%94%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: JMU, NDSU
Week ofJMUNDSUComments
2025-08-2388.7%54.8%215
2025-08-3083.6%78.3%419
2025-09-0622.3%61.1%575
2025-09-1364.3%60.8%264
2025-09-2079.8%61.8%276
2025-09-2792.3%83.3%325
2025-10-0461.7%71.3%471
2025-10-1168.8%79.2%619
2025-10-1890.2%81.7%584
2025-10-2583.9%80.6%844
2025-11-0186.6%79.9%378
2025-11-0884.6%71.6%840
2025-11-1583.2%92.1%791
2025-11-2280.4%74.7%1,332
2025-11-2980%81.7%1,895
2025-12-0663.1%46.8%4,859
2025-12-1370.7%80.6%2,001
2025-12-2058.6%89.1%3,032
2025-12-2777%81.1%307
2026-01-0393.8%81.8%392
2026-01-1067.5%25%479
2026-01-1780.1%89.7%214
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.