Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
James Madison
Dukes
vs
C-USA
Kennesaw State
Owls
JMU sentiment · 16,981 comments
Positive69.5%
Neutral6.7%
Negative22%
Mixed1.8%
KENN sentiment · 4,281 comments
Positive87.4%
Neutral6.2%
Negative5.7%
Mixed0.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

James Madison
Kennesaw State

Fan Score

695
(better)874.3

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

69.5%
(better)87.4%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

James Madison
Kennesaw State

Negativity

220.2
(better)56.8

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

24.3
(better)8.9

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

4.9
(better)3.7

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

James Madison left, Kennesaw State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

James Madison
Kennesaw State

Betting talk

5.8
0.5

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

121.1
69.1

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

5.2
1.4

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: James Madison up, Kennesaw State down
James Madison positive ↑Kennesaw State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
James Madison had the happier comment section in 3 of 22 shared weeks, Kennesaw State in 19.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for James Madison and Kennesaw State
Week ofJames Madison resultJames Madison positive shareJames Madison negative shareKennesaw State resultKennesaw State positive shareKennesaw State negative share
2025-08-2388.7%4.2%L83.2%1.3%
2025-08-30W L83.6%7.9%77%12.9%
2025-09-0622.3%65.5%L72.7%11.7%
2025-09-1364.3%17.1%W87.3%4.9%
2025-09-20W79.8%11.6%W97.2%2.1%
2025-09-27W92.3%5.3%W93.5%3.7%
2025-10-04W61.7%27.1%W92.4%0.8%
2025-10-11W68.8%22%89%1.4%
2025-10-18W90.2%7.5%W90.4%2.2%
2025-10-25W83.9%9%W82.6%7.7%
2025-11-0186.6%5.7%92.2%2%
2025-11-08W84.6%8.9%W90.1%2.9%
2025-11-15W83.2%7.3%L88.5%7.7%
2025-11-22W80.4%11.3%W91.1%4.2%
2025-11-29W W80%12.6%W W91.4%3.5%
2025-12-0663.1%27.3%88.7%4.9%
2025-12-1370.7%20.7%L78.7%13.1%
2025-12-20L58.6%32.5%84.1%10.2%
2025-12-2777%17.8%75%25%
2026-01-0393.8%3.6%100%0%
2026-01-1067.5%24%85.7%6.1%
2026-01-1780.1%14%100%0%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

James MadisonKennesaw State
Harm · JMU +41 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · JMU +15 ptsOff-Field Storylines · KENN +26 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · JMU +41 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • James Madison Harm: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Identity-Based Abuse: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Explicit Language: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Off-Field Storylines: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Sports Betting: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Team & Front Office: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Harm: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State College Sports: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Off-Field Storylines: 39th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State Team & Front Office: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. James Madison's positive share was higher in 4 of 22 shared weeks, Kennesaw State's in 18.

JMUKENN
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: JMU, KENN
Week ofJMUKENNComments
2025-08-2388.7%83.2%291
2025-08-3083.6%77%443
2025-09-0622.3%72.7%577
2025-09-1364.3%87.3%172
2025-09-2079.8%97.2%387
2025-09-2792.3%93.5%277
2025-10-0461.7%92.4%452
2025-10-1168.8%89%432
2025-10-1890.2%90.4%647
2025-10-2583.9%82.6%756
2025-11-0186.6%92.2%296
2025-11-0884.6%90.1%645
2025-11-1583.2%88.5%732
2025-11-2280.4%91.1%1,114
2025-11-2980%91.4%2,037
2025-12-0663.1%88.7%5,331
2025-12-1370.7%78.7%2,266
2025-12-2058.6%84.1%3,143
2025-12-2777%75%274
2026-01-0393.8%100%322
2026-01-1067.5%85.7%516
2026-01-1780.1%100%152
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.