Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Indiana
Hoosiers
vs
Big Ten
Wisconsin
Badgers
On the field
Indiana won 317 on Nov 15.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
IU sentiment · 42,201 comments
Positive73.9%
Neutral9.1%
Negative15.9%
Mixed1.1%
WIS sentiment · 48,811 comments
Positive28.2%
Neutral11%
Negative59.1%
Mixed1.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Indiana
Wisconsin

Fan Score

739.4 (better)
281.5

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

73.9% (better)
28.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Indiana
Wisconsin

Negativity

158.6 (better)
591

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

22.5 (better)
54.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

6.6 (better)
40.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Indiana left, Wisconsin right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Indiana
Wisconsin

Betting talk

3.1
13.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

106.7
222.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

2.7
19.5

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Indiana up, Wisconsin down
Indiana positive ↑Wisconsin positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
IU 31WIS 7
Indiana had the happier comment section in 22 of 22 shared weeks, Wisconsin in 0. When they met on Nov 15, Indiana won 31–7; Indiana’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Indiana and Wisconsin
Week ofIndiana resultIndiana positive shareIndiana negative shareWisconsin resultWisconsin positive shareWisconsin negative share
2025-08-2373.6%14.2%W34.3%52.1%
2025-08-30W49.9%33.6%38.3%50.1%
2025-09-06W W56.3%29.6%W32.4%56.2%
2025-09-1351.2%33.2%L19.2%67.5%
2025-09-20W70.5%18.3%L13.7%77.1%
2025-09-27W62.9%24.6%17.6%70.2%
2025-10-0459%24.6%L24.1%61.9%
2025-10-11W77.5%13.1%L16.5%71.6%
2025-10-18W67.7%17.8%L19.1%67.6%
2025-10-25W78.1%12.7%L27.2%58%
2025-11-01W72.7%17.5%22.7%60.6%
2025-11-08W68%23.8%W55.2%34%
2025-11-15W75.2%15.5%L36.8%48.9%
2025-11-22W81.4%9.7%W59.7%29.3%
2025-11-2964.4%24.7%L25.6%56%
2025-12-06W75.1%16.7%52.3%38.2%
2025-12-1379.8%12.3%60.4%22.9%
2025-12-2072%20.7%40.4%44.2%
2025-12-27W81.6%11.6%57.8%29.9%
2026-01-03W80.9%8%41.5%42.9%
2026-01-1075.9%11.2%49%36.2%
2026-01-17W79.2%10.2%50%42.9%
Reactions from that night · Nov 15
Indiana

He is a beast....and I sure hope he absolutely mows down those pesky Badgers this weekend! DO IT, KAELON!!! 💪👍💯🔥

positiveOpponent HostilityFacebook

Hope the fans stay until the end to pay these guys off, they deserve it!!!

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook
Wisconsin

Defense has shown heart & grit all year. Plus just imagine how additionally hard it is when your offense has no ball control, & multiple turnovers. Put in shitty situations all year and still battling

positiveExplicit WordsFacebook

Let’s just try to throw for more yards than our punter. Keep it simple. Baby steps.

positiveCoachingFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

IndianaWisconsin
Harm · WIS +50 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · WIS +50 ptsExplicit Language · WIS +77 ptsCollege Sports · WIS +92 ptsOff-Field Storylines · IU +26 ptsSports Betting · WIS +46 ptsTeam & Front Office · WIS +64 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Indiana Harm: 37th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Identity-Based Abuse: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Explicit Language: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana College Sports: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Off-Field Storylines: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Sports Betting: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Team & Front Office: 32nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Harm: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Identity-Based Abuse: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Explicit Language: 88th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin College Sports: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Off-Field Storylines: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Sports Betting: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Team & Front Office: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Indiana's positive share was higher in 22 of 22 shared weeks, Wisconsin's in 0.

IUWIS
0%41%82%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: IU, WIS
Week ofIUWISComments
2025-08-2373.6%34.3%2,809
2025-08-3049.9%38.3%1,328
2025-09-0656.3%32.4%3,096
2025-09-1351.2%19.2%4,568
2025-09-2070.5%13.7%6,405
2025-09-2762.9%17.6%2,782
2025-10-0459%24.1%3,259
2025-10-1177.5%16.5%10,637
2025-10-1867.7%19.1%6,695
2025-10-2578.1%27.2%3,605
2025-11-0172.7%22.7%2,584
2025-11-0868%55.2%7,190
2025-11-1575.2%36.8%3,486
2025-11-2281.4%59.7%2,961
2025-11-2964.4%25.6%5,371
2025-12-0675.1%52.3%4,869
2025-12-1379.8%60.4%1,752
2025-12-2072%40.4%451
2025-12-2781.6%57.8%3,975
2026-01-0380.9%41.5%2,901
2026-01-1075.9%49%2,934
2026-01-1779.2%50%7,354
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.