Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Indiana
Hoosiers
vs
SEC
Ole Miss
Rebels
IU sentiment · 42,201 comments
Positive73.9%
Neutral9.1%
Negative15.9%
Mixed1.1%
MISS sentiment · 56,460 comments
Positive66.2%
Neutral10.3%
Negative21.9%
Mixed1.6%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Indiana
Ole Miss

Fan Score

739.4 (better)
662

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

73.9% (better)
66.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Indiana
Ole Miss

Negativity

158.6 (better)
219.1

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

22.5 (better)
42.6

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

6.6 (better)
25.6

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.3Race0.9
0.6Gender2.2
0.1LGBTQIA+0.8
0.6Age0.5

Indiana left, Ole Miss right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Indiana
Ole Miss

Betting talk

3.1
2.1

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

106.7
128.3

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

2.7
4.9

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Indiana up, Ole Miss down
Indiana positive ↑Ole Miss positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Indiana had the happier comment section in 16 of 22 shared weeks, Ole Miss in 6.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Indiana and Ole Miss
Week ofIndiana resultIndiana positive shareIndiana negative shareOle Miss resultOle Miss positive shareOle Miss negative share
2025-08-2373.6%14.2%67%17.4%
2025-08-30W49.9%33.6%W61.7%22.6%
2025-09-06W W56.3%29.6%W62.3%24.3%
2025-09-1351.2%33.2%W63.8%21.4%
2025-09-20W70.5%18.3%W62%22.4%
2025-09-27W62.9%24.6%W65.1%21.8%
2025-10-0459%24.6%78.6%11.8%
2025-10-11W77.5%13.1%W52.9%33.2%
2025-10-18W67.7%17.8%L49.4%38.9%
2025-10-25W78.1%12.7%W70.8%19%
2025-11-01W72.7%17.5%W62.4%21.8%
2025-11-08W68%23.8%W73.5%12%
2025-11-15W75.2%15.5%W62.1%23.8%
2025-11-22W81.4%9.7%W73.1%16.2%
2025-11-2964.4%24.7%58.7%28.7%
2025-12-06W75.1%16.7%64.5%18.2%
2025-12-1379.8%12.3%74.7%12.4%
2025-12-2072%20.7%W67.8%23.5%
2025-12-27W81.6%11.6%W72.1%18.8%
2026-01-03W80.9%8%L70.2%20.1%
2026-01-1075.9%11.2%76.1%15.4%
2026-01-17W79.2%10.2%66.5%27.6%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

IndianaOle Miss
Harm · MISS +33 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · MISS +53 ptsExplicit Language · MISS +46 ptsCollege Sports · MISS +18 ptsOff-Field Storylines · IU +45 ptsSports Betting · IU +43 ptsTeam & Front Office · MISS +26 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Indiana Harm: 37th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Identity-Based Abuse: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Explicit Language: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana College Sports: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Off-Field Storylines: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Sports Betting: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Team & Front Office: 32nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ole Miss Harm: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ole Miss Identity-Based Abuse: 59th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ole Miss Explicit Language: 57th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ole Miss College Sports: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ole Miss Off-Field Storylines: 24th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ole Miss Sports Betting: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Ole Miss Team & Front Office: 58th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Indiana's positive share was higher in 15 of 22 shared weeks, Ole Miss's in 7.

IUMISS
0%41%82%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: IU, MISS
Week ofIUMISSComments
2025-08-2373.6%67%741
2025-08-3049.9%61.7%1,616
2025-09-0656.3%62.3%1,740
2025-09-1351.2%63.8%1,629
2025-09-2070.5%62%2,594
2025-09-2762.9%65.1%3,935
2025-10-0459%78.6%928
2025-10-1177.5%52.9%5,080
2025-10-1867.7%49.4%2,855
2025-10-2578.1%70.8%3,309
2025-11-0172.7%62.4%3,457
2025-11-0868%73.5%4,177
2025-11-1575.2%62.1%4,706
2025-11-2281.4%73.1%3,667
2025-11-2964.4%58.7%11,793
2025-12-0675.1%64.5%6,444
2025-12-1379.8%74.7%4,834
2025-12-2072%67.8%3,635
2025-12-2781.6%72.1%10,230
2026-01-0380.9%70.2%10,576
2026-01-1075.9%76.1%3,490
2026-01-1779.2%66.5%7,225
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.