Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Indiana
Hoosiers
vs
C-USA
Kennesaw State
Owls
On the field
Indiana won 569 on Sep 6.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
IU sentiment · 42,201 comments
Positive73.9%
Neutral9.1%
Negative15.9%
Mixed1.1%
KENN sentiment · 4,281 comments
Positive87.4%
Neutral6.2%
Negative5.7%
Mixed0.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Indiana
Kennesaw State

Fan Score

739.4
(better)874.3

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

73.9%
(better)87.4%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Indiana
Kennesaw State

Negativity

158.6
(better)56.8

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

22.5
(better)8.9

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

6.6
(better)3.7

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Indiana left, Kennesaw State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Indiana
Kennesaw State

Betting talk

3.1
0.5

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

106.7
69.1

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

2.7
1.4

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Indiana up, Kennesaw State down
Indiana positive ↑Kennesaw State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
IU 56KENN 9
Indiana had the happier comment section in 2 of 22 shared weeks, Kennesaw State in 20. When they met on Sep 6, Indiana won 56–9; Kennesaw State’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Indiana and Kennesaw State
Week ofIndiana resultIndiana positive shareIndiana negative shareKennesaw State resultKennesaw State positive shareKennesaw State negative share
2025-08-2373.6%14.2%L83.2%1.3%
2025-08-30W49.9%33.6%77%12.9%
2025-09-06W W56.3%29.6%L72.7%11.7%
2025-09-1351.2%33.2%W87.3%4.9%
2025-09-20W70.5%18.3%W97.2%2.1%
2025-09-27W62.9%24.6%W93.5%3.7%
2025-10-0459%24.6%W92.4%0.8%
2025-10-11W77.5%13.1%89%1.4%
2025-10-18W67.7%17.8%W90.4%2.2%
2025-10-25W78.1%12.7%W82.6%7.7%
2025-11-01W72.7%17.5%92.2%2%
2025-11-08W68%23.8%W90.1%2.9%
2025-11-15W75.2%15.5%L88.5%7.7%
2025-11-22W81.4%9.7%W91.1%4.2%
2025-11-2964.4%24.7%W W91.4%3.5%
2025-12-06W75.1%16.7%88.7%4.9%
2025-12-1379.8%12.3%L78.7%13.1%
2025-12-2072%20.7%84.1%10.2%
2025-12-27W81.6%11.6%75%25%
2026-01-03W80.9%8%100%0%
2026-01-1075.9%11.2%85.7%6.1%
2026-01-17W79.2%10.2%100%0%
Reactions from that night · Sep 6
Indiana

They gotta start running the ball because they're running game is not looking good

negativeCoachingFacebook

You can tell people's expectations are out of control based on one season, Give Coach a chance to work with this group see what he can do. Go IU

positiveCoachingFacebook
Kennesaw State

I'll be in the stands for this one.

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

The match is broadcast live on the 📺 Hariyo Ardhito

neutralBroadcast & MediaFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

IndianaKennesaw State
Harm · IU +35 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · KENN +20 ptsOff-Field Storylines · IU +30 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · IU +26 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Indiana Harm: 37th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Identity-Based Abuse: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Explicit Language: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana College Sports: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Off-Field Storylines: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Sports Betting: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Indiana Team & Front Office: 32nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Harm: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State College Sports: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Off-Field Storylines: 39th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kennesaw State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Kennesaw State Team & Front Office: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Indiana's positive share was higher in 2 of 22 shared weeks, Kennesaw State's in 20.

IUKENN
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: IU, KENN
Week ofIUKENNComments
2025-08-2373.6%83.2%551
2025-08-3049.9%77%726
2025-09-0656.3%72.7%791
2025-09-1351.2%87.3%584
2025-09-2070.5%97.2%1,464
2025-09-2762.9%93.5%1,703
2025-10-0459%92.4%695
2025-10-1177.5%89%3,432
2025-10-1867.7%90.4%1,759
2025-10-2578.1%82.6%1,244
2025-11-0172.7%92.2%1,423
2025-11-0868%90.1%2,919
2025-11-1575.2%88.5%1,318
2025-11-2281.4%91.1%1,189
2025-11-2964.4%91.4%3,340
2025-12-0675.1%88.7%5,501
2025-12-1379.8%78.7%2,108
2025-12-2072%84.1%504
2025-12-2781.6%75%3,832
2026-01-0380.9%100%1,610
2026-01-1075.9%85.7%2,787
2026-01-1779.2%100%7,002
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.