Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big Ten
Illinois
Fighting Illini
vs
Big Ten
Wisconsin
Badgers
On the field
Wisconsin won 2710 on Nov 22.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
ILL sentiment · 15,179 comments
Positive53.3%
Neutral12.2%
Negative32.7%
Mixed1.9%
WIS sentiment · 48,811 comments
Positive28.2%
Neutral11%
Negative59.1%
Mixed1.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Illinois
Wisconsin

Fan Score

532.6 (better)
281.5

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

53.3% (better)
28.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Illinois
Wisconsin

Negativity

327 (better)
591

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

32.9 (better)
54.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

26.7 (better)
40.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Illinois left, Wisconsin right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Illinois
Wisconsin

Betting talk

4.1
13.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

98.2
222.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

7.2
19.5

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Illinois up, Wisconsin down
Illinois positive ↑Wisconsin positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
ILL 10WIS 27
Illinois had the happier comment section in 19 of 22 shared weeks, Wisconsin in 3. When they met on Nov 22, Wisconsin won 27–10; Wisconsin’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Illinois and Wisconsin
Week ofIllinois resultIllinois positive shareIllinois negative shareWisconsin resultWisconsin positive shareWisconsin negative share
2025-08-23W66.7%16.2%W34.3%52.1%
2025-08-3060.7%18%38.3%50.1%
2025-09-06W64.8%23%W32.4%56.2%
2025-09-13W50.9%33%L19.2%67.5%
2025-09-20L17.7%68.6%L13.7%77.1%
2025-09-27W59.6%28.2%17.6%70.2%
2025-10-04W63.1%22%L24.1%61.9%
2025-10-11L34%50.7%L16.5%71.6%
2025-10-1841.3%43.2%L19.1%67.6%
2025-10-25L25.2%63.3%L27.2%58%
2025-11-01W64.9%23.3%22.7%60.6%
2025-11-0864.7%14.5%W55.2%34%
2025-11-15W59.7%26.7%L36.8%48.9%
2025-11-22L27.9%64.3%W59.7%29.3%
2025-11-29W65.8%18.1%L25.6%56%
2025-12-0662.8%14.3%52.3%38.2%
2025-12-1383.8%7.8%60.4%22.9%
2025-12-2082.1%7.3%40.4%44.2%
2025-12-27W80%12.2%57.8%29.9%
2026-01-0363.9%20.1%41.5%42.9%
2026-01-1043.6%30.3%49%36.2%
2026-01-1735.8%31.2%50%42.9%
Reactions from that night · Nov 22
Illinois

Bigger game than.you think!!! We owe Wisconsin a ass whipping,focus& come home with a win, this team is better than their record go illini

positiveExplicit WordsOpponent HostilityFacebook

Here's the link for the streamed: https://www.nrf26.king-cpasports.com/hsfootball.php

neutralBroadcast & MediaFacebook
Wisconsin

Anything to bring fans to the game.. time to fire some coaches.. pitiful

negativeCoachingFacebook

Should be a sellout with the free drink and hotdog.

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

IllinoisWisconsin
Harm · WIS +35 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · WIS +19 ptsExplicit Language · WIS +26 ptsCollege Sports · WIS +39 ptsOff-Field Storylines · ILL +37 ptsSports Betting · WIS +24 ptsTeam & Front Office · WIS +72 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Illinois Harm: 52nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois Identity-Based Abuse: 37th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois Explicit Language: 62nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois College Sports: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois Off-Field Storylines: 80th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois Sports Betting: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Illinois Team & Front Office: 24th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Harm: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Identity-Based Abuse: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Explicit Language: 88th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin College Sports: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Off-Field Storylines: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Sports Betting: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Team & Front Office: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Illinois's positive share was higher in 18 of 22 shared weeks, Wisconsin's in 4.

ILLWIS
0%42%84%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: ILL, WIS
Week ofILLWISComments
2025-08-2366.7%34.3%2,605
2025-08-3060.7%38.3%1,370
2025-09-0664.8%32.4%3,494
2025-09-1350.9%19.2%4,770
2025-09-2017.7%13.7%7,094
2025-09-2759.6%17.6%2,462
2025-10-0463.1%24.1%3,652
2025-10-1134%16.5%8,084
2025-10-1841.3%19.1%5,417
2025-10-2525.2%27.2%3,088
2025-11-0164.9%22.7%1,653
2025-11-0864.7%55.2%4,649
2025-11-1559.7%36.8%2,867
2025-11-2227.9%59.7%2,755
2025-11-2965.8%25.6%3,861
2025-12-0662.8%52.3%655
2025-12-1383.8%60.4%227
2025-12-2082.1%40.4%227
2025-12-2780%57.8%2,090
2026-01-0363.9%41.5%1,777
2026-01-1043.6%49%652
2026-01-1735.8%50%541
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.