Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big 12
Houston
Cougars
vs
American
Memphis
Tigers
HOU sentiment · 17,558 comments
Positive68.3%
Neutral8.2%
Negative22.1%
Mixed1.4%
MEM sentiment · 12,047 comments
Positive70.3%
Neutral10%
Negative18.3%
Mixed1.4%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Houston
Memphis

Fan Score

683.2
(better)703.4

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

68.3%
(better)70.3%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Houston
Memphis

Negativity

220.8
(better)183.3

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

29.8
(better)23.5

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

22.7
(better)6.6

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Houston left, Memphis right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Houston
Memphis

Betting talk

2.8
2.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

115.8
134.4

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

5.6
4.3

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Houston up, Memphis down
Houston positive ↑Memphis positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Houston had the happier comment section in 15 of 22 shared weeks, Memphis in 7.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Houston and Memphis
Week ofHouston resultHouston positive shareHouston negative shareMemphis resultMemphis positive shareMemphis negative share
2025-08-23W65.7%21.2%73.5%12.6%
2025-08-3074.3%15.4%W67.9%14%
2025-09-06W W79%12.8%W73.2%15.7%
2025-09-1375.7%17.1%W69%16%
2025-09-20W79%12%W69.3%20.7%
2025-09-2759.2%28.5%W73.4%12.6%
2025-10-04L49.5%37.3%W84.6%7.7%
2025-10-11W80.9%11.4%57%22.1%
2025-10-18W81.1%10.3%L62.3%26.2%
2025-10-25W86.4%7.5%W W78.7%11.5%
2025-11-01L W47.2%46.4%L70.6%14.7%
2025-11-0873.3%18.4%56.7%32.8%
2025-11-1576.8%15.9%L55.9%32.3%
2025-11-22L47.6%44%L72%16.9%
2025-11-29W82.7%10.8%41.7%40.1%
2025-12-0666.8%10.7%72.8%18.2%
2025-12-1375.8%13%L67.2%22.5%
2025-12-2085.1%5%72.5%16.5%
2025-12-27W57.3%34.3%68.8%22.2%
2026-01-0383.9%7.4%62.4%27.5%
2026-01-1081%7.9%67.1%21.3%
2026-01-1773.8%17.9%90.6%4.2%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

HoustonMemphis
Harm · HOU +10 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · HOU +4 ptsExplicit Language · HOU +43 ptsCollege Sports · MEM +16 ptsOff-Field Storylines · HOU +18 ptsSports Betting · HOU +7 ptsTeam & Front Office · MEM +22 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Houston Harm: 48th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Houston Identity-Based Abuse: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Houston Explicit Language: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Houston College Sports: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Houston Off-Field Storylines: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Houston Sports Betting: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Houston Team & Front Office: 39th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Harm: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Identity-Based Abuse: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Explicit Language: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis College Sports: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Off-Field Storylines: 15th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Sports Betting: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Team & Front Office: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Houston's positive share was higher in 14 of 22 shared weeks, Memphis's in 8.

HOUMEM
0%45%91%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: HOU, MEM
Week ofHOUMEMComments
2025-08-2365.7%73.5%886
2025-08-3074.3%67.9%1,104
2025-09-0679%73.2%998
2025-09-1375.7%69%1,270
2025-09-2079%69.3%2,535
2025-09-2759.2%73.4%2,180
2025-10-0449.5%84.6%1,884
2025-10-1180.9%57%915
2025-10-1881.1%62.3%1,456
2025-10-2586.4%78.7%2,429
2025-11-0147.2%70.6%1,555
2025-11-0873.3%56.7%1,104
2025-11-1576.8%55.9%556
2025-11-2247.6%72%956
2025-11-2982.7%41.7%1,181
2025-12-0666.8%72.8%2,948
2025-12-1375.8%67.2%1,162
2025-12-2085.1%72.5%716
2025-12-2757.3%68.8%2,550
2026-01-0383.9%62.4%434
2026-01-1081%67.1%353
2026-01-1773.8%90.6%433
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.