Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Mountain West
Hawaii
Rainbow Warriors
vs
C-USA
UTEP
Miners
HAW sentiment · 13,185 comments
Positive75.4%
Neutral8.5%
Negative15%
Mixed1.2%
UTEP sentiment · 5,198 comments
Positive49.9%
Neutral8.2%
Negative40%
Mixed1.9%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Hawaii
UTEP

Fan Score

753.9 (better)
498.8

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

75.4% (better)
49.9%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Hawaii
UTEP

Negativity

149.7 (better)
400.2

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

26.4
(better)22.7

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

16.5
(better)11.4

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Hawaii left, UTEP right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Hawaii
UTEP

Betting talk

2.6
3.5

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

74.7
126

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

7.2
8.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Hawaii up, UTEP down
Hawaii positive ↑UTEP positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Hawaii had the happier comment section in 19 of 22 shared weeks, UTEP in 3.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Hawaii and UTEP
Week ofHawaii resultHawaii positive shareHawaii negative shareUTEP resultUTEP positive shareUTEP negative share
2025-08-23W75.9%12.7%74.5%12.8%
2025-08-30L49.4%39.3%L58.2%35.2%
2025-09-06W76.8%10.6%W78.3%13.3%
2025-09-13W68%17.2%L74.2%16.5%
2025-09-20L47.4%42.3%L43.2%48.1%
2025-09-27W84.8%8.8%L37.4%50.5%
2025-10-0466.9%21.1%L28.7%63.3%
2025-10-11W83.3%6.2%W65.6%24.6%
2025-10-18W89.2%4.2%67.7%25.8%
2025-10-2573.3%13.5%L34.1%51.7%
2025-11-01L54.9%34%48.9%41.3%
2025-11-08W84.7%6.8%L51.5%37.4%
2025-11-15L84.9%6.1%L50.6%40%
2025-11-2259.9%30.4%L32.2%57.9%
2025-11-29W82.4%9.5%L36.2%56.3%
2025-12-0686.8%4.6%35.1%62.3%
2025-12-1375.2%13%35.7%46.3%
2025-12-20W83.5%11%38.7%48.4%
2025-12-2773.9%18.3%66.7%0%
2026-01-0367.8%16.1%44.4%39.7%
2026-01-1076.7%5.2%70.6%11.8%
2026-01-1769.4%8.3%40.9%47%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

HawaiiUTEP
Harm · UTEP +6 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · HAW +14 ptsCollege Sports · UTEP +47 ptsOff-Field Storylines · HAW +67 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · UTEP +44 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Hawaii Harm: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Hawaii Identity-Based Abuse: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Hawaii Explicit Language: 44th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Hawaii College Sports: 35th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Hawaii Off-Field Storylines: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Hawaii Sports Betting: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Hawaii Team & Front Office: 9th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UTEP Harm: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UTEP Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UTEP Explicit Language: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UTEP College Sports: 82nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UTEP Off-Field Storylines: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UTEP Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UTEP Team & Front Office: 53rd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Hawaii's positive share was higher in 19 of 22 shared weeks, UTEP's in 3.

HAWUTEP
0%45%89%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: HAW, UTEP
Week ofHAWUTEPComments
2025-08-2375.9%74.5%1,647
2025-08-3049.4%58.2%879
2025-09-0676.8%78.3%923
2025-09-1368%74.2%1,240
2025-09-2047.4%43.2%1,036
2025-09-2784.8%37.4%975
2025-10-0466.9%28.7%523
2025-10-1183.3%65.6%1,169
2025-10-1889.2%67.7%867
2025-10-2573.3%34.1%631
2025-11-0154.9%48.9%631
2025-11-0884.7%51.5%1,065
2025-11-1584.9%50.6%533
2025-11-2259.9%32.2%1,146
2025-11-2982.4%36.2%1,619
2025-12-0686.8%35.1%448
2025-12-1375.2%35.7%593
2025-12-2083.5%38.7%1,706
2025-12-2773.9%66.7%224
2026-01-0367.8%44.4%237
2026-01-1076.7%70.6%189
2026-01-1769.4%40.9%102
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.