Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

SEC
Georgia
Bulldogs
vs
SEC
South Carolina
Gamecocks
UGA sentiment · 38,740 comments
Positive67%
Neutral6.5%
Negative25.3%
Mixed1.3%
SCAR sentiment · 19,697 comments
Positive48.3%
Neutral11%
Negative39.1%
Mixed1.6%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Georgia
South Carolina

Fan Score

669.9 (better)
482.8

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

67% (better)
48.3%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Georgia
South Carolina

Negativity

252.9 (better)
391.4

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

38.5
(better)37.2

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

29.9 (better)
35.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.3Race0.3
1.4Gender2
0.3LGBTQIA+0.4
0.5Age1.2

Georgia left, South Carolina right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Georgia
South Carolina

Betting talk

2.9
1.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

129.2
164

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

1.7
8

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Georgia up, South Carolina down
Georgia positive ↑South Carolina positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Georgia had the happier comment section in 17 of 22 shared weeks, South Carolina in 5.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Georgia and South Carolina
Week ofGeorgia resultGeorgia positive shareGeorgia negative shareSouth Carolina resultSouth Carolina positive shareSouth Carolina negative share
2025-08-2382.1%9.5%67.1%14%
2025-08-30W78.7%13.3%W69.6%17%
2025-09-06W41.6%44.2%W48.8%32.5%
2025-09-13W66.1%27.5%L43.1%44%
2025-09-2081.8%9.1%L35.5%54.3%
2025-09-27L43.8%46%W61.7%28.2%
2025-10-04W77.2%11.6%76.5%9.1%
2025-10-11W45.1%46.6%L35.9%54.8%
2025-10-18W64.3%29.3%L28.4%61.3%
2025-10-2592.9%3.9%L44.5%46.5%
2025-11-01W60.5%31%L31.5%59.4%
2025-11-08W80.5%12.2%49.2%20.8%
2025-11-15W83.4%11.9%L26%64.1%
2025-11-22W W78.8%14.7%W55.2%30.5%
2025-11-2968.5%22.4%L44.3%46%
2025-12-06W80.6%12.5%40.4%43.8%
2025-12-1388.4%6%60.3%30.4%
2025-12-2087.1%7.3%49.3%35.2%
2025-12-27L57.7%36.3%49.1%28.3%
2026-01-0358.8%37.8%61.1%24.6%
2026-01-1082.1%11.2%60.7%25.8%
2026-01-1746%40.8%64.9%22%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

GeorgiaSouth Carolina
Harm · UGA +4 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · SCAR +13 ptsExplicit Language · SCAR +11 ptsCollege Sports · SCAR +43 ptsOff-Field Storylines · UGA +9 ptsSports Betting · UGA +39 ptsTeam & Front Office · SCAR +15 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Georgia Harm: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Identity-Based Abuse: 30th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Explicit Language: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia College Sports: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Off-Field Storylines: 74th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Sports Betting: 44th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Team & Front Office: 60th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Carolina Harm: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Carolina Identity-Based Abuse: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Carolina Explicit Language: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Carolina College Sports: 45th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Carolina Off-Field Storylines: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Carolina Sports Betting: 5th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • South Carolina Team & Front Office: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Georgia's positive share was higher in 18 of 22 shared weeks, South Carolina's in 4.

UGASCAR
0%46%93%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: UGA, SCAR
Week ofUGASCARComments
2025-08-2382.1%67.1%1,233
2025-08-3078.7%69.6%4,695
2025-09-0641.6%48.8%4,116
2025-09-1366.1%43.1%4,945
2025-09-2081.8%35.5%1,560
2025-09-2743.8%61.7%3,574
2025-10-0477.2%76.5%677
2025-10-1145.1%35.9%4,111
2025-10-1864.3%28.4%3,435
2025-10-2592.9%44.5%1,298
2025-11-0160.5%31.5%2,563
2025-11-0880.5%49.2%1,756
2025-11-1583.4%26%3,877
2025-11-2278.8%55.2%2,976
2025-11-2968.5%44.3%4,422
2025-12-0680.6%40.4%5,633
2025-12-1388.4%60.3%1,251
2025-12-2087.1%49.3%1,458
2025-12-2757.7%49.1%3,096
2026-01-0358.8%61.1%330
2026-01-1082.1%60.7%783
2026-01-1746%64.9%648
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.