Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
Georgia State
Panthers
vs
SEC
Tennessee
Volunteers
GAST sentiment · 161 comments
Positive33.5%
Neutral29.2%
Negative32.3%
Mixed5%
TENN sentiment · 53,708 comments
Positive58.1%
Neutral11.8%
Negative28.3%
Mixed1.8%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Georgia State
Tennessee

Fan Score

335.4
(better)581.4

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

33.5%
(better)58.1%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Georgia State
Tennessee

Negativity

323
(better)283

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

24.8 (better)
38.4

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

37.3
(better)27.8

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Georgia State left, Tennessee right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Georgia State
Tennessee

Betting talk

0
1.8

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

260.9
103.2

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

6.2
5.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Georgia State up, Tennessee down
Georgia State positive ↑Tennessee positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Georgia State had the happier comment section in 6 of 15 shared weeks, Tennessee in 9.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Georgia State and Tennessee
Week ofGeorgia State resultGeorgia State positive shareGeorgia State negative shareTennessee resultTennessee positive shareTennessee negative share
2025-08-23100%0%68.1%13.2%
2025-08-30L0%100%W66.3%21.1%
2025-09-06L0%0%W66.5%17.5%
2025-09-13WL59.5%26.3%
2025-09-20L50%0%W56.9%29%
2025-09-2766.7%0%W64.5%24.6%
2025-10-04L62.8%20.2%
2025-10-11L0%50%W58%30.5%
2025-10-18L L0%100%L47.3%39.3%
2025-10-250%0%W61.1%22.5%
2025-11-01L42%43.9%
2025-11-08L48.3%27.5%
2025-11-15LW56.6%25.1%
2025-11-22LW72.2%18.7%
2025-11-29L66.7%0%L54%38%
2025-12-0637.5%43.8%51.2%33.1%
2025-12-1333%32%66.7%23.9%
2025-12-2022.2%11.1%82.3%8.7%
2025-12-27100%0%L35.6%55.8%
2026-01-0333.3%0%48.1%37.2%
2026-01-109.1%63.6%63.8%20.1%
2026-01-1775.5%18.2%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Georgia StateTennessee
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Georgia State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Tennessee Harm: 62nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Tennessee Identity-Based Abuse: 60th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Tennessee Explicit Language: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Tennessee College Sports: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Tennessee Off-Field Storylines: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Tennessee Sports Betting: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Tennessee Team & Front Office: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Georgia State's positive share was higher in 4 of 15 shared weeks, Tennessee's in 11.

GASTTENN
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: GAST, TENN
Week ofGASTTENNComments
2025-08-23100%68.1%2,739
2025-08-300%66.3%3,919
2025-09-060%66.5%3,079
2025-09-130%59.5%2,032
2025-09-2050%56.9%2,637
2025-09-2766.7%64.5%4,690
2025-10-040%62.8%1,711
2025-10-110%58%3,238
2025-10-180%47.3%2,713
2025-10-250%61.1%3,783
2025-11-010%42%2,388
2025-11-080%48.3%1,821
2025-11-150%56.6%2,920
2025-11-220%72.2%4,134
2025-11-2966.7%54%2,308
2025-12-0637.5%51.2%2,830
2025-12-1333%66.7%610
2025-12-2022.2%82.3%376
2025-12-27100%35.6%3,943
2026-01-0333.3%48.1%1,001
2026-01-109.1%63.8%315
2026-01-170%75.5%682
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.