Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
Georgia State
Panthers
vs
ACC
Georgia Tech
Yellow Jackets
GAST sentiment · 161 comments
Positive33.5%
Neutral29.2%
Negative32.3%
Mixed5%
GT sentiment · 35,814 comments
Positive67%
Neutral9.5%
Negative21.3%
Mixed2.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Georgia State
Georgia Tech

Fan Score

335.4
(better)670.1

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

33.5%
(better)67%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Georgia State
Georgia Tech

Negativity

323
(better)213.2

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

24.8
(better)17.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

37.3
(better)9.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Georgia State left, Georgia Tech right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Georgia State
Georgia Tech

Betting talk

0
1.5

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

260.9
94.5

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

6.2
2.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Georgia State up, Georgia Tech down
Georgia State positive ↑Georgia Tech positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Georgia State had the happier comment section in 5 of 15 shared weeks, Georgia Tech in 10.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Georgia State and Georgia Tech
Week ofGeorgia State resultGeorgia State positive shareGeorgia State negative shareGeorgia Tech resultGeorgia Tech positive shareGeorgia Tech negative share
2025-08-23100%0%W87.8%5.9%
2025-08-30L0%100%70.4%18.9%
2025-09-06L0%0%W72.4%11.4%
2025-09-13WW76.6%12.4%
2025-09-20L50%0%W66.2%18.8%
2025-09-2766.7%0%W56.2%32.6%
2025-10-04L73.3%11.8%
2025-10-11L0%50%W73%15.3%
2025-10-18L L0%100%W74.7%15.2%
2025-10-250%0%W76.9%13.3%
2025-11-01L42.1%47.1%
2025-11-08L70.3%16.8%
2025-11-15LW53.1%30.9%
2025-11-22LL L56.2%32.7%
2025-11-29L66.7%0%75.5%17.5%
2025-12-0637.5%43.8%75.2%15.1%
2025-12-1333%32%80.1%11.4%
2025-12-2022.2%11.1%79.8%8%
2025-12-27100%0%L55.4%28.9%
2026-01-0333.3%0%69.3%17.4%
2026-01-109.1%63.6%72.2%15.9%
2026-01-1747.4%36.8%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Georgia StateGeorgia Tech
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Georgia State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia Tech Harm: 22nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Identity-Based Abuse: 9th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Explicit Language: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech College Sports: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Off-Field Storylines: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Sports Betting: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Team & Front Office: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Georgia State's positive share was higher in 3 of 15 shared weeks, Georgia Tech's in 12.

GASTGT
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: GAST, GT
Week ofGASTGTComments
2025-08-23100%87.8%1,019
2025-08-300%70.4%2,356
2025-09-060%72.4%1,176
2025-09-130%76.6%2,860
2025-09-2050%66.2%1,408
2025-09-2766.7%56.2%2,252
2025-10-040%73.3%879
2025-10-110%73%1,920
2025-10-180%74.7%2,785
2025-10-250%76.9%2,255
2025-11-010%42.1%2,012
2025-11-080%70.3%691
2025-11-150%53.1%4,480
2025-11-220%56.2%2,845
2025-11-2966.7%75.5%1,950
2025-12-0637.5%75.2%1,023
2025-12-1333%80.1%1,455
2025-12-2022.2%79.8%973
2025-12-27100%55.4%1,117
2026-01-0333.3%69.3%325
2026-01-109.1%72.2%137
2026-01-170%47.4%57
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.