Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
Georgia Southern
Eagles
vs
Sun Belt
Southern Miss
Golden Eagles
On the field
Southern Miss won 3835 on Oct 9.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
GASO sentiment · 4,449 comments
Positive67.9%
Neutral9.6%
Negative21.1%
Mixed1.5%
USM sentiment · 6,305 comments
Positive73.6%
Neutral10.4%
Negative14.9%
Mixed1%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Georgia Southern
Southern Miss

Fan Score

679.3
(better)736.4

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

67.9%
(better)73.6%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Georgia Southern
Southern Miss

Negativity

210.6
(better)149.1

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

18.9
(better)16.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

14.8
(better)7.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Georgia Southern left, Southern Miss right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Georgia Southern
Southern Miss

Betting talk

0.7
2.4

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

122.7
144.3

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

5.8
7.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Georgia Southern up, Southern Miss down
Georgia Southern positive ↑Southern Miss positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
GASO 35USM 38
Georgia Southern had the happier comment section in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Southern Miss in 14. When they met on Oct 9, Southern Miss won 38–35; Southern Miss’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Georgia Southern and Southern Miss
Week ofGeorgia Southern resultGeorgia Southern positive shareGeorgia Southern negative shareSouthern Miss resultSouthern Miss positive shareSouthern Miss negative share
2025-08-2383.5%4.1%58%16.5%
2025-08-30L64.7%24.7%L65.9%22%
2025-09-06L66.4%23.8%W73%15.4%
2025-09-13W82.5%8.6%W81.7%9.7%
2025-09-20W84.7%10.6%L60.7%24%
2025-09-27L47.9%42.7%W83%6.7%
2025-10-04L42.7%39%W80%10.5%
2025-10-1135.8%54.7%84.8%10.9%
2025-10-18W66.1%22%W85%5.6%
2025-10-25L54.7%39.8%W89.3%5.6%
2025-11-01W65.6%25.4%77.5%10.8%
2025-11-0882.9%7.1%W79.8%9.2%
2025-11-15W83.3%6%L63.5%28.9%
2025-11-22L48.3%42.7%L64.1%27.1%
2025-11-29W56.3%26.6%L68.9%16.4%
2025-12-0639.7%37.9%63.2%22.7%
2025-12-1383.1%7.9%87.1%7.1%
2025-12-2084.1%6.3%L75.1%19%
2025-12-27W87.3%6.3%75.2%19%
2026-01-0380%8%83.3%4.2%
2026-01-1071.4%28.6%80%10%
2026-01-1787.5%12.5%65.5%3.4%
Reactions from that night · Oct 9
Georgia Southern

We're on national TV tonight!! Let's show up and show out!! Time to turn this thing around!!

positiveCrowd & AttendanceBroadcast & MediaFacebook

May we all get the same job security as our AD and football coaches! As Erk famously used to say…”Do…the bare minimum and get an extension!”

positiveFront OfficeCoachingFacebook
Southern Miss

About 25000 too many people in the stands

negativeCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

We will be pulling for you & watching on TV. Southern Miss To The 🔝

positiveBroadcast & MediaFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Georgia SouthernSouthern Miss
Harm · GASO +6 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · GASO +24 ptsCollege Sports · USM +34 ptsOff-Field Storylines · GASO +5 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · USM +19 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Georgia Southern Harm: 26th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia Southern Explicit Language: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern College Sports: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern Off-Field Storylines: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia Southern Team & Front Office: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Harm: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Southern Miss Explicit Language: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss College Sports: 70th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Off-Field Storylines: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Southern Miss Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Southern Miss Team & Front Office: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Georgia Southern's positive share was higher in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Southern Miss's in 14.

GASOUSM
0%45%89%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: GASO, USM
Week ofGASOUSMComments
2025-08-2383.5%58%662
2025-08-3064.7%65.9%887
2025-09-0666.4%73%682
2025-09-1382.5%81.7%700
2025-09-2084.7%60.7%412
2025-09-2747.9%83%349
2025-10-0442.7%80%469
2025-10-1135.8%84.8%237
2025-10-1866.1%85%496
2025-10-2554.7%89.3%611
2025-11-0165.6%77.5%364
2025-11-0882.9%79.8%569
2025-11-1583.3%63.5%440
2025-11-2248.3%64.1%570
2025-11-2956.3%68.9%915
2025-12-0639.7%63.2%800
2025-12-1383.1%87.1%259
2025-12-2084.1%75.1%316
2025-12-2787.3%75.2%863
2026-01-0380%83.3%49
2026-01-1071.4%80%67
2026-01-1787.5%65.5%37
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.