Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
Georgia Southern
Eagles
vs
C-USA
Jacksonville State
Gamecocks
On the field
Georgia Southern won 4134 on Sep 13.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
GASO sentiment · 4,449 comments
Positive67.9%
Neutral9.6%
Negative21.1%
Mixed1.5%
JVST sentiment · 393 comments
Positive81.4%
Neutral11.5%
Negative6.6%
Mixed0.5%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Georgia Southern
Jacksonville State

Fan Score

679.3
(better)814.2

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

67.9%
(better)81.4%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Georgia Southern
Jacksonville State

Negativity

210.6
(better)66.2

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

18.9
(better)10.2

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

14.8
(better)5.1

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Georgia Southern left, Jacksonville State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Georgia Southern
Jacksonville State

Betting talk

0.7
0

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

122.7
56

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

5.8
5.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Georgia Southern up, Jacksonville State down
Georgia Southern positive ↑Jacksonville State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
GASO 41JVST 34
Georgia Southern had the happier comment section in 5 of 21 shared weeks, Jacksonville State in 16. When they met on Sep 13, Georgia Southern won 41–34; Jacksonville State’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Georgia Southern and Jacksonville State
Week ofGeorgia Southern resultGeorgia Southern positive shareGeorgia Southern negative shareJacksonville State resultJacksonville State positive shareJacksonville State negative share
2025-08-2383.5%4.1%L47.1%11.8%
2025-08-30L64.7%24.7%0%25%
2025-09-06L66.4%23.8%W100%0%
2025-09-13W82.5%8.6%L100%0%
2025-09-20W84.7%10.6%W84.6%0%
2025-09-27L47.9%42.7%L75%0%
2025-10-04L42.7%39%W96.6%0%
2025-10-1135.8%54.7%W92.9%0%
2025-10-18W66.1%22%100%0%
2025-10-25L54.7%39.8%W83.3%16.7%
2025-11-01W65.6%25.4%66.7%16.7%
2025-11-0882.9%7.1%W76.2%4.8%
2025-11-15W83.3%6%W85.4%0%
2025-11-22L48.3%42.7%L66.7%33.3%
2025-11-29W56.3%26.6%W L92%4%
2025-12-0639.7%37.9%44.1%35.3%
2025-12-1383.1%7.9%W94.2%1.2%
2025-12-2084.1%6.3%100%0%
2025-12-27W87.3%6.3%
2026-01-0380%8%66.7%16.7%
2026-01-1071.4%28.6%72.7%0%
2026-01-1787.5%12.5%66.7%0%
Reactions from that night · Sep 13
Georgia Southern

He is not the reason the attendance is up. Our fans keep hoping things will change and we start winning.

negativeCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

Don't think you'll are gonna have much of a traffic flow pattern if the team continues to be coached/play called this season, just sayin!

negativeCoachingFacebook
Jacksonville State

No classified reactions captured from Jacksonville State’s comment section that night.

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Georgia SouthernJacksonville State
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Georgia Southern Harm: 26th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia Southern Explicit Language: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern College Sports: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern Off-Field Storylines: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Southern Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Georgia Southern Team & Front Office: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Jacksonville State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Jacksonville State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Jacksonville State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Jacksonville State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Jacksonville State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Jacksonville State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Jacksonville State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Georgia Southern's positive share was higher in 6 of 21 shared weeks, Jacksonville State's in 15.

GASOJVST
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: GASO, JVST
Week ofGASOJVSTComments
2025-08-2383.5%47.1%138
2025-08-3064.7%0%287
2025-09-0666.4%100%127
2025-09-1382.5%100%273
2025-09-2084.7%84.6%242
2025-09-2747.9%75%104
2025-10-0442.7%96.6%193
2025-10-1135.8%92.9%81
2025-10-1866.1%100%183
2025-10-2554.7%83.3%185
2025-11-0165.6%66.7%250
2025-11-0882.9%76.2%91
2025-11-1583.3%85.4%322
2025-11-2248.3%66.7%292
2025-11-2956.3%92%757
2025-12-0639.7%44.1%258
2025-12-1383.1%94.2%175
2025-12-2084.1%100%66
2025-12-2787.3%0%758
2026-01-0380%66.7%31
2026-01-1071.4%72.7%18
2026-01-1787.5%66.7%11
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.