Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Florida left, Texas A&M right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Florida result | Florida positive share | Florida negative share | Texas A&M result | Texas A&M positive share | Texas A&M negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 63.8% | 16.4% | – | 51.6% | 37.5% |
| 2025-08-30 | W | 61.1% | 22.6% | W | 44.9% | 40% |
| 2025-09-06 | L | 24.3% | 67.3% | W | 56.8% | 29.5% |
| 2025-09-13 | L | 31.6% | 56.8% | W | 74.2% | 15.8% |
| 2025-09-20 | L | 27.2% | 61.8% | – | 64.4% | 16.3% |
| 2025-09-27 | – | 38.9% | 49.1% | W | 55.6% | 29.2% |
| 2025-10-04 | W | 55.2% | 31.9% | W | 58.6% | 26.9% |
| 2025-10-11 | L | 33.6% | 53.6% | W | 65.8% | 21.8% |
| 2025-10-18 | W | 38.4% | 47.1% | W | 50.6% | 35.1% |
| 2025-10-25 | – | 63.8% | 26.1% | W | 69.9% | 20.4% |
| 2025-11-01 | L | 56.2% | 34.9% | – | 64.4% | 15.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | L | 30.2% | 61.6% | W | 76.6% | 13% |
| 2025-11-15 | L | 51.3% | 38.4% | W | 58% | 30.1% |
| 2025-11-22 | L | 37.2% | 54.7% | W L | 66.5% | 21.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | W | 61.9% | 27.5% | – | 32.5% | 57.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 55.8% | 28.2% | – | 51.6% | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 50.8% | 31.5% | – | 62.1% | 24.6% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 76.5% | 16.2% | L | 28.8% | 61.2% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 68.2% | 22% | – | 47.1% | 43.1% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 65.2% | 20.2% | – | 40.4% | 47.4% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 67.2% | 19.5% | – | 41% | 27.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 35.6% | 50.8% | – | 50.5% | 4.2% |
“If I could do one thing id get rid of our field goal unit. Like poof, gone, its 4th down territory all game long. I been watching us kick 3s for 20 years. Please stop”
“Cmon boys bring the SWAMP to Texas!”
“I’m so excited to see this game Saturday night!! They are going to look just as, Amazing as they are going to play!!! BTHO OUT OF Gators. Gig’em Aggies 👍🏈🩷”
“Yea!!!! Maroon and White!!!!! Are we having a maroon out!!!!”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Florida Harm: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Florida Identity-Based Abuse: 73rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Florida Explicit Language: 94th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Florida College Sports: 52nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Florida Off-Field Storylines: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Florida Sports Betting: 27th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Florida Team & Front Office: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Harm: 80th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Identity-Based Abuse: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Explicit Language: 83rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M College Sports: 15th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Off-Field Storylines: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Sports Betting: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Texas A&M Team & Front Office: 66th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Florida's positive share was higher in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Texas A&M's in 14.
| Week of | FLA | TAMU | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 63.8% | 51.6% | 1,013 |
| 2025-08-30 | 61.1% | 44.9% | 2,692 |
| 2025-09-06 | 24.3% | 56.8% | 4,311 |
| 2025-09-13 | 31.6% | 74.2% | 4,826 |
| 2025-09-20 | 27.2% | 64.4% | 2,806 |
| 2025-09-27 | 38.9% | 55.6% | 2,216 |
| 2025-10-04 | 55.2% | 58.6% | 4,490 |
| 2025-10-11 | 33.6% | 65.8% | 3,882 |
| 2025-10-18 | 38.4% | 50.6% | 4,877 |
| 2025-10-25 | 63.8% | 69.9% | 7,344 |
| 2025-11-01 | 56.2% | 64.4% | 2,029 |
| 2025-11-08 | 30.2% | 76.6% | 5,584 |
| 2025-11-15 | 51.3% | 58% | 10,801 |
| 2025-11-22 | 37.2% | 66.5% | 6,961 |
| 2025-11-29 | 61.9% | 32.5% | 18,999 |
| 2025-12-06 | 55.8% | 51.6% | 4,242 |
| 2025-12-13 | 50.8% | 62.1% | 1,510 |
| 2025-12-20 | 76.5% | 28.8% | 6,049 |
| 2025-12-27 | 68.2% | 47.1% | 459 |
| 2026-01-03 | 65.2% | 40.4% | 1,324 |
| 2026-01-10 | 67.2% | 41% | 401 |
| 2026-01-17 | 35.6% | 50.5% | 1,340 |