Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

American
Florida Atlantic
Owls
vs
American
Memphis
Tigers
On the field
Memphis won 5526 on Sep 27.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
FAU sentiment · 1,154 comments
Positive66%
Neutral10.1%
Negative22.3%
Mixed1.6%
MEM sentiment · 12,047 comments
Positive70.3%
Neutral10%
Negative18.3%
Mixed1.4%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Florida Atlantic
Memphis

Fan Score

660.3
(better)703.4

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

66%
(better)70.3%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Florida Atlantic
Memphis

Negativity

222.7
(better)183.3

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

9.5 (better)
23.5

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

5.2 (better)
6.6

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Florida Atlantic left, Memphis right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Florida Atlantic
Memphis

Betting talk

3.5
2.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

74.5
134.4

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

14.7
4.3

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Florida Atlantic up, Memphis down
Florida Atlantic positive ↑Memphis positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
FAU 26MEM 55
Florida Atlantic had the happier comment section in 12 of 22 shared weeks, Memphis in 10. When they met on Sep 27, Memphis won 55–26; Memphis’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Florida Atlantic and Memphis
Week ofFlorida Atlantic resultFlorida Atlantic positive shareFlorida Atlantic negative shareMemphis resultMemphis positive shareMemphis negative share
2025-08-2375%16.7%73.5%12.6%
2025-08-30L45.8%48.1%W67.9%14%
2025-09-06W89.5%3.5%W73.2%15.7%
2025-09-13L30.2%62.8%W69%16%
2025-09-2065.2%21.7%W69.3%20.7%
2025-09-27L53.4%39.7%W73.4%12.6%
2025-10-04W93.8%1.3%W84.6%7.7%
2025-10-11W89.3%3.6%57%22.1%
2025-10-18L55.8%32.6%L62.3%26.2%
2025-10-25L64.9%27%W W78.7%11.5%
2025-11-0136.5%6.7%L70.6%14.7%
2025-11-08W88.2%4.9%56.7%32.8%
2025-11-15L53.1%28.1%L55.9%32.3%
2025-11-22L75.2%18.2%L72%16.9%
2025-11-29L52.1%43.6%41.7%40.1%
2025-12-06100%0%72.8%18.2%
2025-12-13100%0%L67.2%22.5%
2025-12-20100%0%72.5%16.5%
2025-12-2752.9%29.4%68.8%22.2%
2026-01-0390%0%62.4%27.5%
2026-01-1075%12.5%67.1%21.3%
2026-01-1775%0%90.6%4.2%
Reactions from that night · Sep 27
Florida Atlantic

Dictating the pace of the game. Memphis thought they could push us around, now we’re in their heads.

positiveOpponent HostilityFacebook

Looking better each week! Keep your heads up! Coach Kittley will get it done no doubt!

positiveCoachingFacebook
Memphis

Saturday night conference home game on tv ! Wow 👏👏👏

positiveBroadcast & MediaFacebook

This team seems to get better as the game goes on. Not a good idea to leave the game early if the Tigers are behind late.

mixedCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Florida AtlanticMemphis
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Florida Atlantic Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Florida Atlantic Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Florida Atlantic Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Florida Atlantic College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Florida Atlantic Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Florida Atlantic Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Florida Atlantic Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Memphis Harm: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Identity-Based Abuse: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Explicit Language: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis College Sports: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Off-Field Storylines: 15th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Sports Betting: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Memphis Team & Front Office: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Florida Atlantic's positive share was higher in 12 of 22 shared weeks, Memphis's in 10.

FAUMEM
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: FAU, MEM
Week ofFAUMEMComments
2025-08-2375%73.5%266
2025-08-3045.8%67.9%838
2025-09-0689.5%73.2%340
2025-09-1330.2%69%605
2025-09-2065.2%69.3%2,158
2025-09-2753.4%73.4%528
2025-10-0493.8%84.6%742
2025-10-1189.3%57%328
2025-10-1855.8%62.3%295
2025-10-2564.9%78.7%1,035
2025-11-0136.5%70.6%533
2025-11-0888.2%56.7%407
2025-11-1553.1%55.9%218
2025-11-2275.2%72%373
2025-11-2952.1%41.7%489
2025-12-06100%72.8%2,181
2025-12-13100%67.2%848
2025-12-20100%72.5%224
2025-12-2752.9%68.8%193
2026-01-0390%62.4%159
2026-01-1075%67.1%172
2026-01-1775%90.6%269
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.