Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

C-USA
FIU
Panthers
vs
C-USA
WKU
Hilltoppers
On the field
FIU won 256 on Oct 14.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
FIU sentiment · 1,631 comments
Positive83%
Neutral7.1%
Negative9.4%
Mixed0.6%
WKU sentiment · 2,689 comments
Positive82.2%
Neutral8%
Negative8.6%
Mixed1.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

FIU
WKU

Fan Score

829.6 (better)
822.2

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

83% (better)
82.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

FIU
WKU

Negativity

93.8
(better)85.5

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

13.5
(better)5.2

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

8.6
(better)1.5

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

FIU left, WKU right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

FIU
WKU

Betting talk

1.8
3.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

120.2
38.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

1.2
4.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: FIU up, WKU down
FIU positive ↑WKU positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
FIU 25WKU 6
FIU had the happier comment section in 10 of 22 shared weeks, WKU in 12. When they met on Oct 14, FIU won 25–6; FIU’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for FIU and WKU
Week ofFIU resultFIU positive shareFIU negative shareWKU resultWKU positive shareWKU negative share
2025-08-23W76.2%4.8%W81.5%7.1%
2025-08-3088.2%4.7%W84.5%3.3%
2025-09-06L85.7%7.9%L60.6%22.7%
2025-09-13W92.6%0%68.2%13.6%
2025-09-20L52.2%17.4%W89.5%0%
2025-09-2772.7%0%W W86.1%5.7%
2025-10-04L86.8%7.5%84.8%8.4%
2025-10-11W85.4%8.6%L37.5%43.3%
2025-10-18L55.9%32.4%W85.1%6.9%
2025-10-25L70%20%90%0%
2025-11-0160.9%13%W98.6%0%
2025-11-08W91%2.6%72.7%3%
2025-11-15W95.5%0%W73.9%9.9%
2025-11-22W94.4%1.4%L73.8%17.3%
2025-11-29W93.4%3%L81.1%9.8%
2025-12-0684.5%3.4%88.3%5.3%
2025-12-1361.5%15.4%100%0%
2025-12-20L90.7%1.2%W90.3%3.6%
2025-12-2758.6%31.4%92.1%0%
2026-01-0370%15%87.5%12.5%
2026-01-1093.3%6.7%87.5%0%
2026-01-1761.5%30.8%100%0%
Reactions from that night · Oct 14
FIU

FIU Offer Kevin 'Deuce' Williams RB/Safety Joe T. Robinson High School In Little Rock Arkansas Scholarship 2025-2026

neutralRecruitingFacebook

FIU Offer Allen Evans 6'2 185 CB Trinity High School In Louisville Kentucky Scholarship 2025-2026

neutralRecruitingFacebook
WKU

WKU Football please tell ESPN to check there signal. It is freezing every other minute

negativeBroadcast & MediaFacebook

There definitely could be some gambling going on here. No doubt. QB?

negativeGamblingFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

FIUWKU
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • FIU Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Off-Field Storylines: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • WKU Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • WKU Team & Front Office: 1st percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. FIU's positive share was higher in 11 of 22 shared weeks, WKU's in 11.

FIUWKU
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: FIU, WKU
Week ofFIUWKUComments
2025-08-2376.2%81.5%189
2025-08-3088.2%84.5%266
2025-09-0685.7%60.6%129
2025-09-1392.6%68.2%76
2025-09-2052.2%89.5%109
2025-09-2772.7%86.1%169
2025-10-0486.8%84.8%231
2025-10-1185.4%37.5%302
2025-10-1855.9%85.1%256
2025-10-2570%90%50
2025-11-0160.9%98.6%96
2025-11-0891%72.7%111
2025-11-1595.5%73.9%227
2025-11-2294.4%73.8%456
2025-11-2993.4%81.1%436
2025-12-0684.5%88.3%152
2025-12-1361.5%100%70
2025-12-2090.7%90.3%666
2025-12-2758.6%92.1%229
2026-01-0370%87.5%36
2026-01-1093.3%87.5%46
2026-01-1761.5%100%18
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.