Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

C-USA
FIU
Panthers
vs
ACC
Miami
Hurricanes
FIU sentiment · 1,631 comments
Positive83%
Neutral7.1%
Negative9.4%
Mixed0.6%
MIA sentiment · 61,113 comments
Positive54.8%
Neutral9%
Negative34.3%
Mixed1.9%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

FIU
Miami

Fan Score

829.6 (better)
548.3

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

83% (better)
54.8%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

FIU
Miami

Negativity

93.8 (better)
342.8

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

13.5 (better)
47.9

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

8.6 (better)
54.6

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

FIU left, Miami right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

FIU
Miami

Betting talk

1.8
5.1

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

120.2
126

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

1.2
4

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: FIU up, Miami down
FIU positive ↑Miami positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
FIU had the happier comment section in 21 of 22 shared weeks, Miami in 1.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for FIU and Miami
Week ofFIU resultFIU positive shareFIU negative shareMiami resultMiami positive shareMiami negative share
2025-08-23W76.2%4.8%68.9%19.8%
2025-08-3088.2%4.7%W61.5%25.3%
2025-09-06L85.7%7.9%W61.1%26.8%
2025-09-13W92.6%0%W61.2%21.9%
2025-09-20L52.2%17.4%W51.7%36.7%
2025-09-2772.7%0%66.1%18.8%
2025-10-04L86.8%7.5%W57.4%18.6%
2025-10-11W85.4%8.6%L49.6%36.5%
2025-10-18L55.9%32.4%21.5%68%
2025-10-25L70%20%W40.6%49.6%
2025-11-0160.9%13%L15.5%77.9%
2025-11-08W91%2.6%W44.8%45.1%
2025-11-15W95.5%0%W64.1%24.3%
2025-11-22W94.4%1.4%W53.8%35.6%
2025-11-29W93.4%3%W67.3%24.2%
2025-12-0684.5%3.4%62.6%29.4%
2025-12-1361.5%15.4%59.4%28.5%
2025-12-20L90.7%1.2%W55.3%37.4%
2025-12-2758.6%31.4%W68.2%23.8%
2026-01-0370%15%W60.3%30%
2026-01-1093.3%6.7%60%28.6%
2026-01-1761.5%30.8%L54.1%35.7%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

FIUMiami
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • FIU Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • FIU Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami Harm: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Identity-Based Abuse: 74th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Explicit Language: 99th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami College Sports: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Off-Field Storylines: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Sports Betting: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Miami Team & Front Office: 53rd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. FIU's positive share was higher in 21 of 22 shared weeks, Miami's in 1.

FIUMIA
0%48%96%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: FIU, MIA
Week ofFIUMIAComments
2025-08-2376.2%68.9%394
2025-08-3088.2%61.5%4,721
2025-09-0685.7%61.1%1,243
2025-09-1392.6%61.2%1,563
2025-09-2052.2%51.7%2,546
2025-09-2772.7%66.1%324
2025-10-0486.8%57.4%3,545
2025-10-1185.4%49.6%716
2025-10-1855.9%21.5%2,468
2025-10-2570%40.6%1,785
2025-11-0160.9%15.5%3,267
2025-11-0891%44.8%1,517
2025-11-1595.5%64.1%1,318
2025-11-2294.4%53.8%2,192
2025-11-2993.4%67.3%2,613
2025-12-0684.5%62.6%2,481
2025-12-1361.5%59.4%1,246
2025-12-2090.7%55.3%3,670
2025-12-2758.6%68.2%6,458
2026-01-0370%60.3%6,574
2026-01-1093.3%60%2,908
2026-01-1761.5%54.1%9,195
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.