Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Eastern Michigan
Eagles
vs
MAC
UMass
Minutemen
EMU sentiment · 67 comments
Positive61.2%
Neutral11.9%
Negative25.4%
Mixed1.5%
MASS sentiment · 1,455 comments
Positive55.1%
Neutral9.8%
Negative33.3%
Mixed1.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Eastern Michigan
UMass

Fan Score

611.9 (better)
551.2

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

61.2% (better)
55.1%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Eastern Michigan
UMass

Negativity

253.7 (better)
333.3

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

29.9
(better)9.6

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

0 (better)
1.4

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Eastern Michigan left, UMass right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Eastern Michigan
UMass

Betting talk

0
9.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

268.7
114.1

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

14.9
11

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Eastern Michigan up, UMass down
Eastern Michigan positive ↑UMass positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Eastern Michigan had the happier comment section in 9 of 15 shared weeks, UMass in 6.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Eastern Michigan and UMass
Week ofEastern Michigan resultEastern Michigan positive shareEastern Michigan negative shareUMass resultUMass positive shareUMass negative share
2025-08-23100%0%94.1%0%
2025-08-30L100%0%L51.3%41%
2025-09-06L100%0%L55.6%32.1%
2025-09-13L0%100%L45.2%33.3%
2025-09-20W89.7%3.4%
2025-09-27LL57.9%42.1%
2025-10-04L100%0%L45%47.5%
2025-10-11W100%0%L43.2%48.2%
2025-10-18L50%50%L53.6%34.5%
2025-10-25L0%0%L66.7%25%
2025-11-01L36.8%41.2%
2025-11-08W63.6%27.3%L27.2%57%
2025-11-15W52%32%L42.6%48.9%
2025-11-22L100%0%L61%29.9%
2025-11-29100%0%36%48%
2025-12-0671.4%14.3%76%16%
2025-12-130%100%68.3%12.2%
2025-12-2040%10%
2025-12-2768.6%13.7%
2026-01-0382.1%12.8%
2026-01-1081.7%14.6%
2026-01-1720%40%78.4%16.2%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Eastern MichiganUMass
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Eastern Michigan Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UMass Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Eastern Michigan's positive share was higher in 9 of 15 shared weeks, UMass's in 6.

EMUMASS
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: EMU, MASS
Week ofEMUMASSComments
2025-08-23100%94.1%69
2025-08-30100%51.3%79
2025-09-06100%55.6%82
2025-09-130%45.2%43
2025-09-200%89.7%29
2025-09-270%57.9%19
2025-10-04100%45%44
2025-10-11100%43.2%141
2025-10-1850%53.6%112
2025-10-250%66.7%25
2025-11-010%36.8%68
2025-11-0863.6%27.2%125
2025-11-1552%42.6%119
2025-11-22100%61%157
2025-11-29100%36%102
2025-12-0671.4%76%32
2025-12-130%68.3%42
2025-12-200%40%20
2025-12-270%68.6%51
2026-01-030%82.1%39
2026-01-100%81.7%82
2026-01-1720%78.4%42
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.