Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Eastern Michigan left, Louisiana right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Eastern Michigan result | Eastern Michigan positive share | Eastern Michigan negative share | Louisiana result | Louisiana positive share | Louisiana negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 100% | 0% | – | 75% | 5% |
| 2025-08-30 | L | 100% | 0% | L | 40.9% | 42.8% |
| 2025-09-06 | L | 100% | 0% | W | 73.7% | 15% |
| 2025-09-13 | L | 0% | 100% | L | 63.6% | 26.3% |
| 2025-09-20 | W | – | – | L | 42.1% | 46% |
| 2025-09-27 | L | – | – | W | 84.1% | 9.1% |
| 2025-10-04 | L | 100% | 0% | – | 96.2% | 0% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 100% | 0% | L | 56.1% | 33.3% |
| 2025-10-18 | L | 50% | 50% | L | 35.3% | 50.9% |
| 2025-10-25 | L | 0% | 0% | L | 38.8% | 53.1% |
| 2025-11-01 | – | – | – | W | 83.4% | 6.7% |
| 2025-11-08 | W | 63.6% | 27.3% | W | 74.7% | 17% |
| 2025-11-15 | W | 52% | 32% | W | 89.1% | 4% |
| 2025-11-22 | L | 100% | 0% | – | 94.7% | 0% |
| 2025-11-29 | – | 100% | 0% | W | 87.4% | 7.9% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 71.4% | 14.3% | – | 70.6% | 15.2% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 0% | 100% | L | 49.9% | 40.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | – | – | – | 75% | 10% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | – | – | – | 100% | 0% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | – | – | – | 100% | 0% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | – | – | – | 88% | 4% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 20% | 40% | – | 100% | 0% |
No classified reactions captured from Eastern Michigan’s comment section that night.
“Let's come back home with a win and no injuries!! Geaux Cajuns🤟🤟🤟”
“We’re losing to literally the worst team in D1 Football. Can we finally all admit that Desormeaux isn’t the man for this job! Embarrassing!”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Eastern Michigan Harm: low volume, not ranked
- Eastern Michigan Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Eastern Michigan Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
- Eastern Michigan College Sports: low volume, not ranked
- Eastern Michigan Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
- Eastern Michigan Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Eastern Michigan Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
- Louisiana Harm: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Louisiana Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Louisiana Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
- Louisiana College Sports: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Louisiana Off-Field Storylines: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Louisiana Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Louisiana Team & Front Office: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Eastern Michigan's positive share was higher in 9 of 15 shared weeks, Louisiana's in 6.
| Week of | EMU | UL | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 100% | 75% | 81 |
| 2025-08-30 | 100% | 40.9% | 480 |
| 2025-09-06 | 100% | 73.7% | 248 |
| 2025-09-13 | 0% | 63.6% | 119 |
| 2025-09-20 | 0% | 42.1% | 202 |
| 2025-09-27 | 0% | 84.1% | 428 |
| 2025-10-04 | 100% | 96.2% | 57 |
| 2025-10-11 | 100% | 56.1% | 125 |
| 2025-10-18 | 50% | 35.3% | 175 |
| 2025-10-25 | 0% | 38.8% | 148 |
| 2025-11-01 | 0% | 83.4% | 193 |
| 2025-11-08 | 63.6% | 74.7% | 205 |
| 2025-11-15 | 52% | 89.1% | 347 |
| 2025-11-22 | 100% | 94.7% | 41 |
| 2025-11-29 | 100% | 87.4% | 789 |
| 2025-12-06 | 71.4% | 70.6% | 211 |
| 2025-12-13 | 0% | 49.9% | 354 |
| 2025-12-20 | 0% | 75% | 20 |
| 2025-12-27 | 0% | 100% | 6 |
| 2026-01-03 | 0% | 100% | 6 |
| 2026-01-10 | 0% | 88% | 25 |
| 2026-01-17 | 20% | 100% | 20 |