Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

C-USA
Delaware
Blue Hens
vs
Sun Belt
James Madison
Dukes
DEL sentiment · 5,242 comments
Positive66.4%
Neutral10.5%
Negative21.1%
Mixed2%
JMU sentiment · 16,981 comments
Positive69.5%
Neutral6.7%
Negative22%
Mixed1.8%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Delaware
James Madison

Fan Score

664.1
(better)695

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

66.4%
(better)69.5%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Delaware
James Madison

Negativity

211.2 (better)
220.2

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

26.9
(better)24.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

3.4 (better)
4.9

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Delaware left, James Madison right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Delaware
James Madison

Betting talk

4
5.8

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

63.5
121.1

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

5.7
5.2

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Delaware up, James Madison down
Delaware positive ↑James Madison positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Delaware had the happier comment section in 7 of 22 shared weeks, James Madison in 15.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Delaware and James Madison
Week ofDelaware resultDelaware positive shareDelaware negative shareJames Madison resultJames Madison positive shareJames Madison negative share
2025-08-23W59.5%24.9%88.7%4.2%
2025-08-3077.7%11.2%W L83.6%7.9%
2025-09-06L65.1%19.5%22.3%65.5%
2025-09-13W86.3%6.7%64.3%17.1%
2025-09-20W79.4%12.6%W79.8%11.6%
2025-09-27L59.4%21.8%W92.3%5.3%
2025-10-0459.2%28.4%W61.7%27.1%
2025-10-11L69.8%16.8%W68.8%22%
2025-10-18W47.4%39.9%W90.2%7.5%
2025-10-2550.6%31.3%W83.9%9%
2025-11-01L38.3%48.7%86.6%5.7%
2025-11-08W69.9%16.9%W84.6%8.9%
2025-11-15L54.6%34%W83.2%7.3%
2025-11-22L62.8%28%W80.4%11.3%
2025-11-29W57.9%23.6%W W80%12.6%
2025-12-0668.1%14.1%63.1%27.3%
2025-12-13W86.7%5.5%70.7%20.7%
2025-12-2070.6%14.7%L58.6%32.5%
2025-12-2775.4%10.1%77%17.8%
2026-01-0388.5%5.8%93.8%3.6%
2026-01-1067%25%67.5%24%
2026-01-1770%14%80.1%14%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

DelawareJames Madison
Harm · JMU +1 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · DEL +36 ptsExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · DEL +37 ptsOff-Field Storylines · DEL +14 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · JMU +45 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Delaware Harm: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Delaware Identity-Based Abuse: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Delaware Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Delaware College Sports: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Delaware Off-Field Storylines: 27th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Delaware Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Delaware Team & Front Office: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Harm: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Identity-Based Abuse: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Explicit Language: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Off-Field Storylines: 13th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Sports Betting: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • James Madison Team & Front Office: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Delaware's positive share was higher in 6 of 22 shared weeks, James Madison's in 16.

DELJMU
0%47%94%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: DEL, JMU
Week ofDELJMUComments
2025-08-2359.5%88.7%315
2025-08-3077.7%83.6%519
2025-09-0665.1%22.3%598
2025-09-1386.3%64.3%325
2025-09-2079.4%79.8%441
2025-09-2759.4%92.3%270
2025-10-0459.2%61.7%620
2025-10-1169.8%68.8%538
2025-10-1847.4%90.2%1,189
2025-10-2550.6%83.9%592
2025-11-0138.3%86.6%348
2025-11-0869.9%84.6%882
2025-11-1554.6%83.2%690
2025-11-2262.8%80.4%1,095
2025-11-2957.9%80%2,045
2025-12-0668.1%63.1%4,606
2025-12-1386.7%70.7%2,682
2025-12-2070.6%58.6%3,020
2025-12-2775.4%77%339
2026-01-0388.5%93.8%356
2026-01-1067%67.5%567
2026-01-1770%80.1%186
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.