Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big 12
Colorado
Buffaloes
vs
Big 12
Iowa State
Cyclones
On the field
Colorado won 2417 on Oct 11.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
COLO sentiment · 13,180 comments
Positive59.5%
Neutral8.5%
Negative30.6%
Mixed1.3%
ISU sentiment · 21,588 comments
Positive54.5%
Neutral9.1%
Negative34.2%
Mixed2.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Colorado
Iowa State

Fan Score

595.4 (better)
545

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

59.5% (better)
54.5%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Colorado
Iowa State

Negativity

306.4 (better)
341.7

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

15.2 (better)
34

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

4 (better)
27.5

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.2Race0.3
0.2Gender1.3
0.1LGBTQIA+0.4
0.5Age0.5

Colorado left, Iowa State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Colorado
Iowa State

Betting talk

4.1
2.8

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

119
173.3

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

10.5
13.2

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Colorado up, Iowa State down
Colorado positive ↑Iowa State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
COLO 24ISU 17
Colorado had the happier comment section in 11 of 22 shared weeks, Iowa State in 11. When they met on Oct 11, Colorado won 24–17; Colorado’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Colorado and Iowa State
Week ofColorado resultColorado positive shareColorado negative shareIowa State resultIowa State positive shareIowa State negative share
2025-08-23L74.5%12.2%W80.3%11%
2025-08-3055.8%34.4%W76.3%11.2%
2025-09-06W L81%11%W63.4%27.1%
2025-09-1333.4%54.7%W49.2%38.8%
2025-09-20W72.9%17.9%69.3%16.4%
2025-09-27L54%36.8%W75.9%14.1%
2025-10-04L48.4%42.9%L37.3%52.8%
2025-10-11W73.5%20.6%L24.5%67.8%
2025-10-1881.3%10.4%68.2%9.3%
2025-10-25L28.6%61.1%L30.6%57.1%
2025-11-01L42.3%46.4%L41.6%48.6%
2025-11-08L58.8%29.2%W71.7%20.3%
2025-11-1561.4%28.6%84.4%7.4%
2025-11-22L67.4%22.5%W81.9%9.4%
2025-11-29L44.5%45.3%W56.5%32.9%
2025-12-0658.1%29.6%39.5%45.6%
2025-12-1364%28.1%41%53%
2025-12-20100%0%64.9%21.5%
2025-12-2760%30%62.4%25.6%
2026-01-0354.5%31.8%56.5%24.8%
2026-01-1065.6%25.6%63%28.9%
2026-01-1756.8%33.9%52.2%30.7%
Reactions from that night · Oct 11
Colorado

Why are we featuring a 4th string LB here?

negativeCoachingFacebook

Five ways for Colorado to turn their football program around: 1. Fire Deion Sanders 2. Fire Deion Sanders 3. Fire Deion Sanders 4. Fire Deion Sanders 5. Fire Deion Sanders

negativeCoachingFacebook
Iowa State

I’m really worried about all the injuries!❤️💛😲

positiveInjuriesFacebook

Use a 4 man defensive front. Don’t fall in love with the 3 man front. Cost us the game against Cincy.

negativeCoachingFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

ColoradoIowa State
Harm · ISU +38 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · ISU +60 ptsCollege Sports · ISU +14 ptsOff-Field Storylines · ISU +96 ptsSports Betting · COLO +36 ptsTeam & Front Office · ISU +40 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Colorado Harm: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Colorado Explicit Language: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado College Sports: 55th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Off-Field Storylines: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Sports Betting: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Team & Front Office: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Iowa State Harm: 59th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Iowa State Identity-Based Abuse: 26th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Iowa State Explicit Language: 64th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Iowa State College Sports: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Iowa State Off-Field Storylines: 99th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Iowa State Sports Betting: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Iowa State Team & Front Office: 82nd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Colorado's positive share was higher in 11 of 22 shared weeks, Iowa State's in 11.

COLOISU
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: COLO, ISU
Week ofCOLOISUComments
2025-08-2374.5%80.3%2,282
2025-08-3055.8%76.3%1,618
2025-09-0681%63.4%4,082
2025-09-1333.4%49.2%2,145
2025-09-2072.9%69.3%1,413
2025-09-2754%75.9%1,694
2025-10-0448.4%37.3%1,846
2025-10-1173.5%24.5%1,869
2025-10-1881.3%68.2%251
2025-10-2528.6%30.6%2,089
2025-11-0142.3%41.6%1,942
2025-11-0858.8%71.7%1,735
2025-11-1561.4%84.4%864
2025-11-2267.4%81.9%1,434
2025-11-2944.5%56.5%1,830
2025-12-0658.1%39.5%5,029
2025-12-1364%41%189
2025-12-20100%64.9%232
2025-12-2760%62.4%804
2026-01-0354.5%56.5%274
2026-01-1065.6%63%423
2026-01-1756.8%52.2%723
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.