Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big 12
Colorado
Buffaloes
vs
C-USA
Delaware
Blue Hens
On the field
Colorado won 317 on Sep 6.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
COLO sentiment · 13,180 comments
Positive59.5%
Neutral8.5%
Negative30.6%
Mixed1.3%
DEL sentiment · 5,242 comments
Positive66.4%
Neutral10.5%
Negative21.1%
Mixed2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Colorado
Delaware

Fan Score

595.4
(better)664.1

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

59.5%
(better)66.4%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Colorado
Delaware

Negativity

306.4
(better)211.2

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

15.2 (better)
26.9

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

4
(better)3.4

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.2Race0.6
0.2Gender1.1
0.5Age1.1

Colorado left, Delaware right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Colorado
Delaware

Betting talk

4.1
4

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

119
63.5

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

10.5
5.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Colorado up, Delaware down
Colorado positive ↑Delaware positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
COLO 31DEL 7
Colorado had the happier comment section in 7 of 22 shared weeks, Delaware in 15. When they met on Sep 6, Colorado won 31–7; Colorado’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Colorado and Delaware
Week ofColorado resultColorado positive shareColorado negative shareDelaware resultDelaware positive shareDelaware negative share
2025-08-23L74.5%12.2%W59.5%24.9%
2025-08-3055.8%34.4%77.7%11.2%
2025-09-06W L81%11%L65.1%19.5%
2025-09-1333.4%54.7%W86.3%6.7%
2025-09-20W72.9%17.9%W79.4%12.6%
2025-09-27L54%36.8%L59.4%21.8%
2025-10-04L48.4%42.9%59.2%28.4%
2025-10-11W73.5%20.6%L69.8%16.8%
2025-10-1881.3%10.4%W47.4%39.9%
2025-10-25L28.6%61.1%50.6%31.3%
2025-11-01L42.3%46.4%L38.3%48.7%
2025-11-08L58.8%29.2%W69.9%16.9%
2025-11-1561.4%28.6%L54.6%34%
2025-11-22L67.4%22.5%L62.8%28%
2025-11-29L44.5%45.3%W57.9%23.6%
2025-12-0658.1%29.6%68.1%14.1%
2025-12-1364%28.1%W86.7%5.5%
2025-12-20100%0%70.6%14.7%
2025-12-2760%30%75.4%10.1%
2026-01-0354.5%31.8%88.5%5.8%
2026-01-1065.6%25.6%67%25%
2026-01-1756.8%33.9%70%14%
Reactions from that night · Sep 6
Colorado

Because you can't trust the Coach. 🤣😂

negativeCoachingFacebook

Play both quarterbacks ain't nobody doing it. Promise you it will work.

positiveCoachingFacebook
Delaware

Deion did state he plans on playing his back ups for a good portion of the game.

neutralCoachingFacebook

Can't remember Delaware ever being 26 point underdogs, but they're in the big leagues now

positiveGamblingFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

ColoradoDelaware
Harm · DEL +21 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · DEL +20 ptsOff-Field Storylines · DEL +24 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · COLO +40 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Colorado Harm: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Colorado Explicit Language: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado College Sports: 55th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Off-Field Storylines: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Sports Betting: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Team & Front Office: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Delaware Harm: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Delaware Identity-Based Abuse: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Delaware Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Delaware College Sports: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Delaware Off-Field Storylines: 27th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Delaware Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Delaware Team & Front Office: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Colorado's positive share was higher in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Delaware's in 14.

COLODEL
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: COLO, DEL
Week ofCOLODELComments
2025-08-2374.5%59.5%811
2025-08-3055.8%77.7%860
2025-09-0681%65.1%2,342
2025-09-1333.4%86.3%1,151
2025-09-2072.9%79.4%1,117
2025-09-2754%59.4%881
2025-10-0448.4%59.2%758
2025-10-1173.5%69.8%937
2025-10-1881.3%47.4%864
2025-10-2528.6%50.6%1,013
2025-11-0142.3%38.3%792
2025-11-0858.8%69.9%1,039
2025-11-1561.4%54.6%532
2025-11-2267.4%62.8%899
2025-11-2944.5%57.9%1,509
2025-12-0658.1%68.1%955
2025-12-1364%86.7%909
2025-12-20100%70.6%61
2025-12-2760%75.4%89
2026-01-0354.5%88.5%96
2026-01-1065.6%67%350
2026-01-1756.8%70%457
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.