Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Big 12
Colorado
Buffaloes
vs
Mountain West
Colorado State
Rams
COLO sentiment · 13,180 comments
Positive59.5%
Neutral8.5%
Negative30.6%
Mixed1.3%
CSU sentiment · 4,505 comments
Positive43.2%
Neutral9.7%
Negative45.4%
Mixed1.8%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Colorado
Colorado State

Fan Score

595.4 (better)
431.7

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

59.5% (better)
43.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Colorado
Colorado State

Negativity

306.4 (better)
453.9

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

15.2 (better)
34

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

4 (better)
7.5

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Colorado left, Colorado State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Colorado
Colorado State

Betting talk

4.1
4.4

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

119
236.6

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

10.5
14

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Colorado up, Colorado State down
Colorado positive ↑Colorado State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Colorado had the happier comment section in 11 of 21 shared weeks, Colorado State in 10.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Colorado and Colorado State
Week ofColorado resultColorado positive shareColorado negative shareColorado State resultColorado State positive shareColorado State negative share
2025-08-23L74.5%12.2%77.6%10.5%
2025-08-3055.8%34.4%L62.6%23.1%
2025-09-06W L81%11%W23%62.9%
2025-09-1333.4%54.7%55.6%38.9%
2025-09-20W72.9%17.9%L27.1%61.2%
2025-09-27L54%36.8%L L23.1%68.9%
2025-10-04L48.4%42.9%W31.8%56.3%
2025-10-11W73.5%20.6%72.1%17.5%
2025-10-1881.3%10.4%L39.6%47.5%
2025-10-25L28.6%61.1%L26.6%65.2%
2025-11-01L42.3%46.4%40%30%
2025-11-08L58.8%29.2%L35.6%47.3%
2025-11-1561.4%28.6%L52.3%36.4%
2025-11-22L67.4%22.5%L L43.4%45.3%
2025-11-29L44.5%45.3%60.1%29.4%
2025-12-0658.1%29.6%65.3%24%
2025-12-1364%28.1%81%9.5%
2025-12-20100%0%80%10%
2025-12-2760%30%80.3%14.5%
2026-01-0354.5%31.8%60%20%
2026-01-1065.6%25.6%50%12.5%
2026-01-1756.8%33.9%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

ColoradoColorado State
Harm · CSU +45 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · CSU +14 ptsCollege Sports · CSU +41 ptsOff-Field Storylines · CSU +73 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · CSU +56 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Colorado Harm: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Colorado Explicit Language: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado College Sports: 55th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Off-Field Storylines: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Sports Betting: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado Team & Front Office: 42nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado State Harm: 66th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Colorado State Explicit Language: 18th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado State College Sports: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado State Off-Field Storylines: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Colorado State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Colorado State Team & Front Office: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Colorado's positive share was higher in 13 of 21 shared weeks, Colorado State's in 8.

COLOCSU
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: COLO, CSU
Week ofCOLOCSUComments
2025-08-2374.5%77.6%714
2025-08-3055.8%62.6%982
2025-09-0681%23%2,562
2025-09-1333.4%55.6%914
2025-09-2072.9%27.1%1,173
2025-09-2754%23.1%1,140
2025-10-0448.4%31.8%830
2025-10-1173.5%72.1%1,084
2025-10-1881.3%39.6%525
2025-10-2528.6%26.6%1,393
2025-11-0142.3%40%658
2025-11-0858.8%35.6%777
2025-11-1561.4%52.3%498
2025-11-2267.4%43.4%1,321
2025-11-2944.5%60.1%1,335
2025-12-0658.1%65.3%817
2025-12-1364%81%110
2025-12-20100%80%37
2025-12-2760%80.3%96
2026-01-0354.5%60%54
2026-01-1065.6%50%258
2026-01-1756.8%0%407
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.