Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

American
Charlotte
49ers
vs
American
Rice
Owls
On the field
Rice won 2817 on Sep 18.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
CLT sentiment · 1,447 comments
Positive41.7%
Neutral9.3%
Negative46.6%
Mixed2.4%
RICE sentiment · 1,436 comments
Positive85.8%
Neutral7.5%
Negative6.5%
Mixed0.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Charlotte
Rice

Fan Score

416.7
(better)857.9

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

41.7%
(better)85.8%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Charlotte
Rice

Negativity

466.5
(better)64.8

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

22.8
(better)10.4

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

20
(better)7.7

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Charlotte left, Rice right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Charlotte
Rice

Betting talk

18
0.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

145.8
41.8

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

34.6
2.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Charlotte up, Rice down
Charlotte positive ↑Rice positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
CLT 17RICE 28
Charlotte had the happier comment section in 4 of 21 shared weeks, Rice in 17. When they met on Sep 18, Rice won 28–17; Rice’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Charlotte and Rice
Week ofCharlotte resultCharlotte positive shareCharlotte negative shareRice resultRice positive shareRice negative share
2025-08-23L88.9%0%91.4%5.2%
2025-08-3033.3%66.7%W77.4%10%
2025-09-06L26.1%39.1%L70.3%11%
2025-09-13W L75%12.5%W W91.6%3.4%
2025-09-20100%0%87.8%6.1%
2025-09-27L14.3%71.4%L84%1.3%
2025-10-0437.5%62.5%L90.8%3.9%
2025-10-11L39.5%50%L87.2%10.3%
2025-10-18L L36.6%49.5%100%0%
2025-10-2526.8%62.2%W L91%5%
2025-11-0164.3%21.4%90%10%
2025-11-08L34.4%50.3%W100%0%
2025-11-15L31.4%55.5%91.3%4.3%
2025-11-22L51.1%38.8%L97.4%0%
2025-11-29L43%49.3%L94%4%
2025-12-0647.9%33.3%83.3%4.2%
2025-12-1312.5%62.5%85.7%0%
2025-12-20100%0%
2025-12-27100%0%L78.5%14.1%
2026-01-0390.9%4.5%77.1%11.4%
2026-01-1092.3%3.8%97.1%2.9%
2026-01-1792.3%7.7%85%0%
Reactions from that night · Sep 18
Charlotte

Time to show CB our stuff!

positiveFacebook

At least we can’t lose this week

positiveFacebook
Rice

Y’all owe these dudes! They seem to be a “kryptonite” of sorts (especially at home). Kick theis butts, Owls!!! Will be watching tomorrow night. 👍

positiveOpponent HostilityFacebook

So glad it'll be on ESPN and I can watch! Go OWLS!

positiveBroadcast & MediaFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

CharlotteRice
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Charlotte Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Charlotte Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Rice Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Rice Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Rice Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Rice College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Rice Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Rice Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Rice Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Charlotte's positive share was higher in 4 of 21 shared weeks, Rice's in 17.

CLTRICE
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: CLT, RICE
Week ofCLTRICEComments
2025-08-2388.9%91.4%67
2025-08-3033.3%77.4%233
2025-09-0626.1%70.3%114
2025-09-1375%91.6%186
2025-09-20100%87.8%85
2025-09-2714.3%84%82
2025-10-0437.5%90.8%100
2025-10-1139.5%87.2%153
2025-10-1836.6%100%115
2025-10-2526.8%91%264
2025-11-0164.3%90%34
2025-11-0834.4%100%212
2025-11-1531.4%91.3%243
2025-11-2251.1%97.4%227
2025-11-2943%94%273
2025-12-0647.9%83.3%96
2025-12-1312.5%85.7%62
2025-12-20100%0%4
2025-12-27100%78.5%157
2026-01-0390.9%77.1%57
2026-01-1092.3%97.1%86
2026-01-1792.3%85%33
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.