Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

ACC
California
Golden Bears
vs
Big Ten
UCLA
Bruins
CAL sentiment · 534 comments
Positive59.9%
Neutral10.9%
Negative27.7%
Mixed1.5%
UCLA sentiment · 20,831 comments
Positive47.6%
Neutral7%
Negative43%
Mixed2.4%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

California
UCLA

Fan Score

599.3 (better)
476.4

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

59.9% (better)
47.6%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

California
UCLA

Negativity

277.2 (better)
429.9

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

37.5 (better)
54.1

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

30 (better)
38.2

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

California left, UCLA right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

California
UCLA

Betting talk

5.6
7.2

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

104.9
206.6

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

5.6
13.6

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: California up, UCLA down
California positive ↑UCLA positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
California had the happier comment section in 11 of 21 shared weeks, UCLA in 10.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for California and UCLA
Week ofCalifornia resultCalifornia positive shareCalifornia negative shareUCLA resultUCLA positive shareUCLA negative share
2025-08-2362.4%30.2%
2025-08-30W100%0%L22.3%69.5%
2025-09-06W75%20%L L22%69.5%
2025-09-13W60%40%16.4%72.8%
2025-09-20L0%60%45.3%44.2%
2025-09-27W68.6%25.7%L26.7%61.5%
2025-10-04L10%60%W69.3%22.9%
2025-10-11W40%44%W73.6%16.9%
2025-10-18L72%24%W73%19.2%
2025-10-2588.1%11.9%L30%57%
2025-11-01L57.4%31.5%71.3%19.3%
2025-11-08W46.2%46.2%L42.2%46.6%
2025-11-1570.7%29.3%L67.2%25.2%
2025-11-22L61.1%38.9%L30.3%57.8%
2025-11-29W33.3%50%L38.1%52.8%
2025-12-0666.7%0%67.7%22.5%
2025-12-1369.7%12.1%55.5%36.5%
2025-12-20L19.2%67.3%66.1%25.1%
2025-12-2759.1%18.2%58.4%32.1%
2026-01-0347.4%21.1%81.3%12.1%
2026-01-1069.4%2%74.4%5.1%
2026-01-1774.5%13.7%48.5%40.9%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

CaliforniaUCLA
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • California Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • California Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • California Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • California College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • California Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • California Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • California Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • UCLA Harm: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UCLA Identity-Based Abuse: 64th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UCLA Explicit Language: 85th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UCLA College Sports: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UCLA Off-Field Storylines: 21st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UCLA Sports Betting: 97th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UCLA Team & Front Office: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. California's positive share was higher in 11 of 21 shared weeks, UCLA's in 10.

CALUCLA
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: CAL, UCLA
Week ofCALUCLAComments
2025-08-230%62.4%149
2025-08-30100%22.3%1,979
2025-09-0675%22%1,437
2025-09-1360%16.4%2,167
2025-09-200%45.3%358
2025-09-2768.6%26.7%1,148
2025-10-0410%69.3%2,593
2025-10-1140%73.6%1,474
2025-10-1872%73%1,390
2025-10-2588.1%30%925
2025-11-0157.4%71.3%204
2025-11-0846.2%42.2%858
2025-11-1570.7%67.2%1,863
2025-11-2261.1%30.3%1,022
2025-11-2933.3%38.1%775
2025-12-0666.7%67.7%1,699
2025-12-1369.7%55.5%244
2025-12-2019.2%66.1%430
2025-12-2759.1%58.4%212
2026-01-0347.4%81.3%233
2026-01-1069.4%74.4%88
2026-01-1774.5%48.5%117
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.