Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Buffalo
Bulls
vs
ACC
Syracuse
Orange
BUFF sentiment · 341 comments
Positive54.5%
Neutral24.3%
Negative20.8%
Mixed0.3%
SYR sentiment · 9,364 comments
Positive38.7%
Neutral8.1%
Negative50.9%
Mixed2.4%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Buffalo
Syracuse

Fan Score

545.5 (better)
386.7

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

54.5% (better)
38.7%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Buffalo
Syracuse

Negativity

208.2 (better)
508.8

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

23.5 (better)
57.9

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

8.8 (better)
42.4

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Buffalo left, Syracuse right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Buffalo
Syracuse

Betting talk

5.9
4.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

88
144.4

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

0
11.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Buffalo up, Syracuse down
Buffalo positive ↑Syracuse positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Buffalo had the happier comment section in 17 of 22 shared weeks, Syracuse in 5.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Buffalo and Syracuse
Week ofBuffalo resultBuffalo positive shareBuffalo negative shareSyracuse resultSyracuse positive shareSyracuse negative share
2025-08-23L50%12.5%84.7%9.4%
2025-08-3073.3%13.3%L37.7%52%
2025-09-06W63.6%18.2%W W39.9%49.3%
2025-09-13W61.1%27.8%58.7%29.8%
2025-09-20L63%22.2%W60.3%29.7%
2025-09-27L78.9%21.1%L26.6%64.4%
2025-10-04W100%0%L33.9%57.1%
2025-10-1129%54.8%61.6%31.2%
2025-10-18W40%13.3%L38.2%53.6%
2025-10-25L81%9.5%L L35%57.5%
2025-11-01W66.7%25%26.2%59.2%
2025-11-08L66.7%0%L30.5%59.5%
2025-11-15L61.5%30.8%51.4%38.7%
2025-11-22L25%50%L20.3%71%
2025-11-2959.3%25.9%L25.9%65.5%
2025-12-0663.6%18.2%36.6%38.9%
2025-12-1319.4%6.5%32.5%45.5%
2025-12-2050%0%42.9%48.6%
2025-12-2740%0%80%20%
2026-01-0337.5%50%57.6%37.6%
2026-01-1090%0%64.2%23.1%
2026-01-1761.5%7.7%72.7%0%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

BuffaloSyracuse
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Buffalo Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Syracuse Harm: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse Identity-Based Abuse: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse Explicit Language: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse College Sports: 79th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse Off-Field Storylines: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse Sports Betting: 84th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Syracuse Team & Front Office: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Buffalo's positive share was higher in 16 of 22 shared weeks, Syracuse's in 6.

BUFFSYR
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BUFF, SYR
Week ofBUFFSYRComments
2025-08-2350%84.7%186
2025-08-3073.3%37.7%1,064
2025-09-0663.6%39.9%844
2025-09-1361.1%58.7%434
2025-09-2063%60.3%1,065
2025-09-2778.9%26.6%432
2025-10-04100%33.9%534
2025-10-1129%61.6%156
2025-10-1840%38.2%547
2025-10-2581%35%678
2025-11-0166.7%26.2%588
2025-11-0866.7%30.5%327
2025-11-1561.5%51.4%225
2025-11-2225%20.3%1,162
2025-11-2959.3%25.9%595
2025-12-0663.6%36.6%391
2025-12-1319.4%32.5%154
2025-12-2050%42.9%47
2025-12-2740%80%15
2026-01-0337.5%57.6%93
2026-01-1090%64.2%144
2026-01-1761.5%72.7%24
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.