Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Buffalo
Bulls
vs
Big Ten
Minnesota
Golden Gophers
On the field
Minnesota won 2310 on Aug 28.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
BUFF sentiment · 341 comments
Positive54.5%
Neutral24.3%
Negative20.8%
Mixed0.3%
MINN sentiment · 16,116 comments
Positive39.7%
Neutral10.9%
Negative47.3%
Mixed2.1%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Buffalo
Minnesota

Fan Score

545.5 (better)
396.7

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

54.5% (better)
39.7%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Buffalo
Minnesota

Negativity

208.2 (better)
472.8

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

23.5 (better)
62.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

8.8 (better)
16.7

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Buffalo left, Minnesota right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Buffalo
Minnesota

Betting talk

5.9
4.2

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

88
144.3

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

0
15.3

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Buffalo up, Minnesota down
Buffalo positive ↑Minnesota positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
BUFF 10MINN 23
Buffalo had the happier comment section in 21 of 22 shared weeks, Minnesota in 1. When they met on Aug 28, Minnesota won 23–10; Buffalo’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Buffalo and Minnesota
Week ofBuffalo resultBuffalo positive shareBuffalo negative shareMinnesota resultMinnesota positive shareMinnesota negative share
2025-08-23L50%12.5%W54%31.4%
2025-08-3073.3%13.3%43.6%46.1%
2025-09-06W63.6%18.2%W37.2%45%
2025-09-13W61.1%27.8%L23.2%66%
2025-09-20L63%22.2%53.5%32.4%
2025-09-27L78.9%21.1%W55.5%33.8%
2025-10-04W100%0%L27.7%57.6%
2025-10-1129%54.8%W W49%34.2%
2025-10-18W40%13.3%54%35.4%
2025-10-25L81%9.5%L20.4%66.5%
2025-11-01W66.7%25%W35.2%51.2%
2025-11-08L66.7%0%L49.4%30%
2025-11-15L61.5%30.8%20.1%66.2%
2025-11-22L25%50%L25.5%64.2%
2025-11-2959.3%25.9%W48.1%40%
2025-12-0663.6%18.2%41.8%43.2%
2025-12-1319.4%6.5%41.6%45.1%
2025-12-2050%0%W51.1%37.8%
2025-12-2740%0%47.4%41.3%
2026-01-0337.5%50%35.8%49.1%
2026-01-1090%0%48.9%27.7%
2026-01-1761.5%7.7%43.8%43.8%
Reactions from that night · Aug 28
Buffalo

I have a giveaway change to win sometime today

positiveFacebook
Minnesota

Vikes should pick up Daniel Jackson!

positiveFront OfficeFacebook

Bring the juice! Bring the noise!

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

BuffaloMinnesota
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Buffalo Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Minnesota Harm: 94th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota Identity-Based Abuse: 79th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota Explicit Language: 45th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota College Sports: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota Off-Field Storylines: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota Sports Betting: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Minnesota Team & Front Office: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Buffalo's positive share was higher in 15 of 22 shared weeks, Minnesota's in 7.

BUFFMINN
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BUFF, MINN
Week ofBUFFMINNComments
2025-08-2350%54%809
2025-08-3073.3%43.6%180
2025-09-0663.6%37.2%877
2025-09-1361.1%23.2%441
2025-09-2063%53.5%345
2025-09-2778.9%55.5%570
2025-10-04100%27.7%984
2025-10-1129%49%800
2025-10-1840%54%1,034
2025-10-2581%20.4%1,723
2025-11-0166.7%35.2%1,115
2025-11-0866.7%49.4%186
2025-11-1561.5%20.1%935
2025-11-2225%25.5%962
2025-11-2959.3%48.1%2,288
2025-12-0663.6%41.8%624
2025-12-1319.4%41.6%144
2025-12-2050%51.1%817
2025-12-2740%47.4%1,476
2026-01-0337.5%35.8%61
2026-01-1090%48.9%57
2026-01-1761.5%43.8%29
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.