Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Buffalo
Bulls
vs
MAC
Miami (Ohio)
RedHawks
On the field
Miami (Ohio) won 3720 on Nov 19.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
BUFF sentiment · 341 comments
Positive54.5%
Neutral24.3%
Negative20.8%
Mixed0.3%
M-OH sentiment · 1,085 comments
Positive79%
Neutral8.7%
Negative11.6%
Mixed0.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Buffalo
Miami (Ohio)

Fan Score

545.5
(better)789.9

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

54.5%
(better)79%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Buffalo
Miami (Ohio)

Negativity

208.2
(better)116.1

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

23.5
(better)13.8

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

8.8
(better)1.8

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Buffalo left, Miami (Ohio) right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Buffalo
Miami (Ohio)

Betting talk

5.9
0.9

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

88
49.8

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

0
3.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Buffalo up, Miami (Ohio) down
Buffalo positive ↑Miami (Ohio) positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
BUFF 20M-OH 37
Buffalo had the happier comment section in 8 of 21 shared weeks, Miami (Ohio) in 13. When they met on Nov 19, Miami (Ohio) won 37–20; Miami (Ohio)’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Buffalo and Miami (Ohio)
Week ofBuffalo resultBuffalo positive shareBuffalo negative shareMiami (Ohio) resultMiami (Ohio) positive shareMiami (Ohio) negative share
2025-08-23L50%12.5%L85.3%5.9%
2025-08-3073.3%13.3%57.1%33.3%
2025-09-06W63.6%18.2%L72.4%13.8%
2025-09-13W61.1%27.8%76.9%7.7%
2025-09-20L63%22.2%L51.6%29%
2025-09-27L78.9%21.1%W86.7%3.3%
2025-10-04W100%0%W94%2.4%
2025-10-1129%54.8%W90.6%1.9%
2025-10-18W40%13.3%W81.3%0%
2025-10-25L81%9.5%W83.2%4.7%
2025-11-01W66.7%25%L63.8%27.6%
2025-11-08L66.7%0%L60.9%19.6%
2025-11-15L61.5%30.8%W88.6%6.4%
2025-11-22L25%50%89.7%7.7%
2025-11-2959.3%25.9%W83.2%8.8%
2025-12-0663.6%18.2%L68.1%25%
2025-12-1319.4%6.5%86.7%13.3%
2025-12-2050%0%78.4%5.4%
2025-12-2740%0%L60.8%27.8%
2026-01-0337.5%50%
2026-01-1090%0%80%0%
2026-01-1761.5%7.7%100%0%
Reactions from that night · Nov 19
Buffalo

Do you have to bring your ice chest or freezer to the stadium??? Or is left eye willie will be waiting for you in the parking lot 🤣🤣

positiveStadium ExperienceFacebook

Why don't people go to the games?

negativeCrowd & AttendanceFacebook
Miami (Ohio)

Thanks,Rick. We’re planning on tailgating Sat after Thanksgiving, Drop on By. We’ll have food and beverages! John N Bridget.

positiveStadium ExperienceFacebook

Let’s GOOOOO! Let’s show these Buffalo boys the Hawks ain’t done!

positiveFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

BuffaloMiami (Ohio)
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Buffalo Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Buffalo's positive share was higher in 6 of 21 shared weeks, Miami (Ohio)'s in 15.

BUFFM-OH
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BUFF, M-OH
Week ofBUFFM-OHComments
2025-08-2350%85.3%84
2025-08-3073.3%57.1%36
2025-09-0663.6%72.4%40
2025-09-1361.1%76.9%31
2025-09-2063%51.6%58
2025-09-2778.9%86.7%49
2025-10-04100%94%87
2025-10-1129%90.6%84
2025-10-1840%81.3%47
2025-10-2581%83.2%128
2025-11-0166.7%63.8%70
2025-11-0866.7%60.9%52
2025-11-1561.5%88.6%153
2025-11-2225%89.7%51
2025-11-2959.3%83.2%152
2025-12-0663.6%68.1%83
2025-12-1319.4%86.7%46
2025-12-2050%78.4%49
2025-12-2740%60.8%89
2026-01-0337.5%0%8
2026-01-1090%80%15
2026-01-1761.5%100%14
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.