Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Buffalo
Bulls
vs
Big 12
Kansas
Jayhawks
BUFF sentiment · 341 comments
Positive54.5%
Neutral24.3%
Negative20.8%
Mixed0.3%
KU sentiment · 8,065 comments
Positive44.1%
Neutral12.7%
Negative41.5%
Mixed1.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Buffalo
Kansas

Fan Score

545.5 (better)
440.9

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

54.5% (better)
44.1%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Buffalo
Kansas

Negativity

208.2 (better)
414.9

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

23.5 (better)
56.8

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

8.8 (better)
32.7

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Buffalo left, Kansas right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Buffalo
Kansas

Betting talk

5.9
5.2

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

88
134.9

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

0
6.8

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Buffalo up, Kansas down
Buffalo positive ↑Kansas positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Buffalo had the happier comment section in 14 of 22 shared weeks, Kansas in 8.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Buffalo and Kansas
Week ofBuffalo resultBuffalo positive shareBuffalo negative shareKansas resultKansas positive shareKansas negative share
2025-08-23L50%12.5%W W64.5%22.1%
2025-08-3073.3%13.3%43.7%35.2%
2025-09-06W63.6%18.2%L38.8%48.8%
2025-09-13W61.1%27.8%40.1%24.1%
2025-09-20L63%22.2%W65.8%18.3%
2025-09-27L78.9%21.1%L29.2%57.4%
2025-10-04W100%0%W73.6%17.7%
2025-10-1129%54.8%L32.9%55.2%
2025-10-18W40%13.3%49.4%17.5%
2025-10-25L81%9.5%L20.5%68.8%
2025-11-01W66.7%25%W46.8%37.5%
2025-11-08L66.7%0%L24%65.5%
2025-11-15L61.5%30.8%64.4%24.1%
2025-11-22L25%50%L L28.7%61.9%
2025-11-2959.3%25.9%57.2%34.2%
2025-12-0663.6%18.2%55.6%33.9%
2025-12-1319.4%6.5%50%34%
2025-12-2050%0%45.5%36.4%
2025-12-2740%0%70.9%18.8%
2026-01-0337.5%50%52.4%36.9%
2026-01-1090%0%50%10%
2026-01-1761.5%7.7%35.6%31.7%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

BuffaloKansas
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Buffalo Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Buffalo Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Kansas Harm: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas Identity-Based Abuse: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas Explicit Language: 75th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas College Sports: 34th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas Off-Field Storylines: 61st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas Sports Betting: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kansas Team & Front Office: 62nd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Buffalo's positive share was higher in 13 of 22 shared weeks, Kansas's in 9.

BUFFKU
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BUFF, KU
Week ofBUFFKUComments
2025-08-2350%64.5%891
2025-08-3073.3%43.7%640
2025-09-0663.6%38.8%576
2025-09-1361.1%40.1%250
2025-09-2063%65.8%311
2025-09-2778.9%29.2%495
2025-10-04100%73.6%771
2025-10-1129%32.9%377
2025-10-1840%49.4%432
2025-10-2581%20.5%899
2025-11-0166.7%46.8%367
2025-11-0866.7%24%397
2025-11-1561.5%64.4%100
2025-11-2225%28.7%1,020
2025-11-2959.3%57.2%179
2025-12-0663.6%55.6%191
2025-12-1319.4%50%131
2025-12-2050%45.5%23
2025-12-2740%70.9%127
2026-01-0337.5%52.4%92
2026-01-1090%50%20
2026-01-1761.5%35.6%117
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.