Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Bowling Green left, UMass right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Bowling Green result | Bowling Green positive share | Bowling Green negative share | UMass result | UMass positive share | UMass negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | W | 79.8% | 5.5% | – | 94.1% | 0% |
| 2025-08-30 | – | 72.2% | 5.2% | L | 51.3% | 41% |
| 2025-09-06 | L | 64.4% | 4.3% | L | 55.6% | 32.1% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 77.8% | 4.9% | L | 45.2% | 33.3% |
| 2025-09-20 | L | 86.3% | 1.6% | – | 89.7% | 3.4% |
| 2025-09-27 | L | 70.9% | 14.9% | L | 57.9% | 42.1% |
| 2025-10-04 | – | 64.5% | 10.8% | L | 45% | 47.5% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 82.2% | 5.4% | L | 43.2% | 48.2% |
| 2025-10-18 | L | 78.9% | 7% | L | 53.6% | 34.5% |
| 2025-10-25 | L | 74.6% | 12.7% | L | 66.7% | 25% |
| 2025-11-01 | L | 68.2% | 22.4% | L | 36.8% | 41.2% |
| 2025-11-08 | L | 84.1% | 6.8% | L | 27.2% | 57% |
| 2025-11-15 | L | 79.7% | 13% | L | 42.6% | 48.9% |
| 2025-11-22 | W | 88.4% | 4.6% | L | 61% | 29.9% |
| 2025-11-29 | – | 83.3% | 11.1% | – | 36% | 48% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 83.6% | 12% | – | 76% | 16% |
| 2025-12-13 | – | 92% | 4.5% | – | 68.3% | 12.2% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 66.7% | 17.5% | – | 40% | 10% |
| 2025-12-27 | – | 76.7% | 7.3% | – | 68.6% | 13.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 76.9% | 8.3% | – | 82.1% | 12.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 95.3% | 0% | – | 81.7% | 14.6% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 95.6% | 2.2% | – | 78.4% | 16.2% |
“Well I sure hope the defense coach taught the defensive backs never let the receiver get past you by playing to close to the line of scrimmage then let the opponent score on a 75 yard pass play to lose the game”
“Now you’re talkin’ Coach!”
“Jon's Affordable Football Cards don’t tell me we traded it away”
“Congratulations on making it through the most embarrassing season in UMass history. This Coach needs to be fired.”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Bowling Green Harm: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Bowling Green Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- Bowling Green Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
- Bowling Green College Sports: 38th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Bowling Green Off-Field Storylines: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Bowling Green Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Bowling Green Team & Front Office: 10th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- UMass Harm: low volume, not ranked
- UMass Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
- UMass Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
- UMass College Sports: low volume, not ranked
- UMass Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
- UMass Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- UMass Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Bowling Green's positive share was higher in 19 of 22 shared weeks, UMass's in 3.
| Week of | BGSU | MASS | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 79.8% | 94.1% | 524 |
| 2025-08-30 | 72.2% | 51.3% | 459 |
| 2025-09-06 | 64.4% | 55.6% | 314 |
| 2025-09-13 | 77.8% | 45.2% | 245 |
| 2025-09-20 | 86.3% | 89.7% | 473 |
| 2025-09-27 | 70.9% | 57.9% | 160 |
| 2025-10-04 | 64.5% | 45% | 243 |
| 2025-10-11 | 82.2% | 43.2% | 526 |
| 2025-10-18 | 78.9% | 53.6% | 181 |
| 2025-10-25 | 74.6% | 66.7% | 87 |
| 2025-11-01 | 68.2% | 36.8% | 175 |
| 2025-11-08 | 84.1% | 27.2% | 158 |
| 2025-11-15 | 79.7% | 42.6% | 163 |
| 2025-11-22 | 88.4% | 61% | 327 |
| 2025-11-29 | 83.3% | 36% | 136 |
| 2025-12-06 | 83.6% | 76% | 208 |
| 2025-12-13 | 92% | 68.3% | 129 |
| 2025-12-20 | 66.7% | 40% | 77 |
| 2025-12-27 | 76.7% | 68.6% | 201 |
| 2026-01-03 | 76.9% | 82.1% | 147 |
| 2026-01-10 | 95.3% | 81.7% | 125 |
| 2026-01-17 | 95.6% | 78.4% | 82 |