Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

ACC
Boston College
Eagles
vs
ACC
Georgia Tech
Yellow Jackets
On the field
Georgia Tech won 3634 on Nov 15.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
BC sentiment · 3,381 comments
Positive46.2%
Neutral9%
Negative42.9%
Mixed2%
GT sentiment · 35,814 comments
Positive67%
Neutral9.5%
Negative21.3%
Mixed2.2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Boston College
Georgia Tech

Fan Score

462
(better)670.1

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

46.2%
(better)67%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Boston College
Georgia Tech

Negativity

428.6
(better)213.2

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

21.3
(better)17.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

17.5
(better)9.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.6Race0.2
0.9Gender0.7
0.6LGBTQIA+0.3
0.9Age0.4

Boston College left, Georgia Tech right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Boston College
Georgia Tech

Betting talk

9.2
1.5

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

126.9
94.5

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

22.5
2.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Boston College up, Georgia Tech down
Boston College positive ↑Georgia Tech positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
BC 34GT 36
Boston College had the happier comment section in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Georgia Tech in 14. When they met on Nov 15, Georgia Tech won 36–34; Georgia Tech’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Boston College and Georgia Tech
Week ofBoston College resultBoston College positive shareBoston College negative shareGeorgia Tech resultGeorgia Tech positive shareGeorgia Tech negative share
2025-08-2366.1%23.2%W87.8%5.9%
2025-08-30W67.9%16.3%70.4%18.9%
2025-09-06L49.6%35.9%W72.4%11.4%
2025-09-13L24.5%68.8%W76.6%12.4%
2025-09-2071.4%28.6%W66.2%18.8%
2025-09-27L31.1%59.2%W56.2%32.6%
2025-10-04L20.5%71.6%73.3%11.8%
2025-10-11L42.9%57.1%W73%15.3%
2025-10-18L22.4%66.1%W74.7%15.2%
2025-10-25L34.2%54.1%W76.9%13.3%
2025-11-01L53.8%35.7%L42.1%47.1%
2025-11-08L29.8%53.5%70.3%16.8%
2025-11-15L56.1%36.3%W53.1%30.9%
2025-11-2274.8%16.5%L L56.2%32.7%
2025-11-29W77.5%14.9%75.5%17.5%
2025-12-0672.9%15.7%75.2%15.1%
2025-12-1357.1%26.5%80.1%11.4%
2025-12-2093.5%6.5%79.8%8%
2025-12-2790.9%7.3%L55.4%28.9%
2026-01-0362.1%20.5%69.3%17.4%
2026-01-1075%15.6%72.2%15.9%
2026-01-1753.8%15.4%47.4%36.8%
Reactions from that night · Nov 15
Boston College

BC vs umass in december at foxboro. Would be a sell out

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

Senior day still under O'Brien. Thought he would be fired by now.

negativeCoachingFacebook
Georgia Tech

Just need to be able to get you tube tv to work out deal with abc/espn

neutralBroadcast & MediaFacebook

What dish channel is this?

neutralBroadcast & MediaFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Boston CollegeGeorgia Tech
Harm · BC +9 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · BC +25 ptsCollege Sports · BC +91 ptsOff-Field Storylines · BC +8 ptsSports Betting · BC +96 ptsTeam & Front Office · BC +35 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Boston College Harm: 31st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boston College Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Boston College Explicit Language: 48th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boston College College Sports: 99th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boston College Off-Field Storylines: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boston College Sports Betting: 98th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boston College Team & Front Office: 55th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Harm: 22nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Identity-Based Abuse: 9th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Explicit Language: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech College Sports: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Off-Field Storylines: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Sports Betting: 2nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Georgia Tech Team & Front Office: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Boston College's positive share was higher in 9 of 22 shared weeks, Georgia Tech's in 13.

BCGT
0%47%94%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BC, GT
Week ofBCGTComments
2025-08-2366.1%87.8%1,070
2025-08-3067.9%70.4%2,543
2025-09-0649.6%72.4%1,423
2025-09-1324.5%76.6%3,052
2025-09-2071.4%66.2%1,420
2025-09-2731.1%56.2%2,455
2025-10-0420.5%73.3%1,231
2025-10-1142.9%73%1,925
2025-10-1822.4%74.7%3,141
2025-10-2534.2%76.9%2,535
2025-11-0153.8%42.1%2,233
2025-11-0829.8%70.3%966
2025-11-1556.1%53.1%4,637
2025-11-2274.8%56.2%2,960
2025-11-2977.5%75.5%2,196
2025-12-0672.9%75.2%1,077
2025-12-1357.1%80.1%1,404
2025-12-2093.5%79.8%1,010
2025-12-2790.9%55.4%1,171
2026-01-0362.1%69.3%454
2026-01-1075%72.2%222
2026-01-1753.8%47.4%70
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.