Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Mountain West
Boise State
Broncos
vs
Big Ten
Washington
Huskies
On the field
Washington won 3810 on Dec 13 at a neutral site.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
BSU sentiment · 22,030 comments
Positive48.8%
Neutral15.4%
Negative33.8%
Mixed2.1%
WASH sentiment · 8,090 comments
Positive59.5%
Neutral9.6%
Negative28.9%
Mixed2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Boise State
Washington

Fan Score

487.9
(better)594.6

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

48.8%
(better)59.5%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Boise State
Washington

Negativity

338.1
(better)288.6

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

45.7
(better)32.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

38.5
(better)29.7

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.4Race0.4
1.8Gender1.1
0.4LGBTQIA+0.1
0.4Age0.9

Boise State left, Washington right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Boise State
Washington

Betting talk

3.4
2

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

126.1
104

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

8.8
6.6

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Boise State up, Washington down
Boise State positive ↑Washington positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
BSU 10WASH 38
Boise State had the happier comment section in 7 of 22 shared weeks, Washington in 15. When they met on Dec 13, Washington won 38–10; Washington’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Boise State and Washington
Week ofBoise State resultBoise State positive shareBoise State negative shareWashington resultWashington positive shareWashington negative share
2025-08-23L36.8%45.5%58.6%27.1%
2025-08-30W42.8%42%W53.4%26.9%
2025-09-0655.3%28.7%W60.4%26.8%
2025-09-1368%15.2%67.1%22.2%
2025-09-20W59.4%18.5%W70.3%20.7%
2025-09-27W65.3%22%L34%54.4%
2025-10-04L39%42.3%W W81.5%11.2%
2025-10-11W53.3%31.3%73.3%18.4%
2025-10-18W W74.7%12.2%L35.2%53.7%
2025-10-2549.1%26.7%W68.9%20.5%
2025-11-01L31.3%56.4%73.3%15.7%
2025-11-0846.7%33.7%L14.3%75.8%
2025-11-15L30.7%51.3%W65.2%24.5%
2025-11-22W W53.2%26.8%W63.4%22.2%
2025-11-29W60.8%22.3%L57.5%28.6%
2025-12-0665.1%14.6%57.7%29.6%
2025-12-13L31.9%54.6%W70.4%18.2%
2025-12-2025.8%31.5%44.7%34%
2025-12-2743.9%36.6%67.9%13.6%
2026-01-0351.2%25%37.2%46%
2026-01-1063.9%22.8%72%16.3%
2026-01-1747.1%31%80%17.5%
Reactions from that night · Dec 13
Boise State

That stadium is amazing!! Let's go Broncos! 💙🏈🧡

positiveStadium ExperienceFacebook

WE Want You to play it safe. No Targeting.

positiveOfficiatingFacebook
Washington

lol have fun at your JV bowl game! Sucks to suck! But tune in on Dec 20 and cheer on the best team in PNW! Go 🦆’s

negativeOpponent HostilityFacebook

It’s not worth going to play the game even it’s a shit bowl

negativeExplicit WordsFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Boise StateWashington
Harm · BSU +23 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · BSU +48 ptsExplicit Language · BSU +17 ptsCollege Sports · BSU +15 ptsOff-Field Storylines · WASH +4 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · BSU +26 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Boise State Harm: 73rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State Identity-Based Abuse: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State Explicit Language: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State College Sports: 78th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State Off-Field Storylines: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State Sports Betting: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State Team & Front Office: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington Harm: 50th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington Identity-Based Abuse: 33rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington Explicit Language: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington College Sports: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington Off-Field Storylines: 94th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Washington Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Washington Team & Front Office: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Boise State's positive share was higher in 7 of 22 shared weeks, Washington's in 15.

BSUWASH
0%41%82%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BSU, WASH
Week ofBSUWASHComments
2025-08-2336.8%58.6%2,902
2025-08-3042.8%53.4%1,066
2025-09-0655.3%60.4%1,080
2025-09-1368%67.1%487
2025-09-2059.4%70.3%1,820
2025-09-2765.3%34%1,415
2025-10-0439%81.5%2,191
2025-10-1153.3%73.3%1,026
2025-10-1874.7%35.2%1,336
2025-10-2549.1%68.9%959
2025-11-0131.3%73.3%1,801
2025-11-0846.7%14.3%912
2025-11-1530.7%65.2%2,016
2025-11-2253.2%63.4%2,272
2025-11-2960.8%57.5%2,968
2025-12-0665.1%57.7%2,702
2025-12-1331.9%70.4%1,697
2025-12-2025.8%44.7%136
2025-12-2743.9%67.9%122
2026-01-0351.2%37.2%277
2026-01-1063.9%72%634
2026-01-1747.1%80%301
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.