Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Mountain West
Boise State
Broncos
vs
Mountain West
New Mexico
Lobos
On the field
Boise State won 4125 on Oct 11.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
BSU sentiment · 22,030 comments
Positive48.8%
Neutral15.4%
Negative33.8%
Mixed2.1%
UNM sentiment · 8,500 comments
Positive83.6%
Neutral6.4%
Negative8.5%
Mixed1.4%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Boise State
New Mexico

Fan Score

487.9
(better)836.1

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

48.8%
(better)83.6%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Boise State
New Mexico

Negativity

338.1
(better)85.4

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

45.7
(better)10.8

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

38.5
(better)2.7

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.4Race0.2
1.8Gender0.6
0.4Age0.1

Boise State left, New Mexico right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Boise State
New Mexico

Betting talk

3.4
2

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

126.1
127.5

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

8.8
2.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Boise State up, New Mexico down
Boise State positive ↑New Mexico positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
BSU 41UNM 25
Boise State had the happier comment section in 0 of 22 shared weeks, New Mexico in 22. When they met on Oct 11, Boise State won 41–25; New Mexico’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Boise State and New Mexico
Week ofBoise State resultBoise State positive shareBoise State negative shareNew Mexico resultNew Mexico positive shareNew Mexico negative share
2025-08-23L36.8%45.5%77.6%8.5%
2025-08-30W42.8%42%L79.6%13.7%
2025-09-0655.3%28.7%W W92.1%1.5%
2025-09-1368%15.2%85.9%8.3%
2025-09-20W59.4%18.5%78.4%8.2%
2025-09-27W65.3%22%W L82.5%7.8%
2025-10-04L39%42.3%67.8%25.6%
2025-10-11W53.3%31.3%L84.7%6.4%
2025-10-18W W74.7%12.2%W80.7%6%
2025-10-2549.1%26.7%W85.8%7.3%
2025-11-01L31.3%56.4%W93.8%2.5%
2025-11-0846.7%33.7%80.3%11%
2025-11-15L30.7%51.3%W82.9%9.2%
2025-11-22W W53.2%26.8%W W89.6%4.5%
2025-11-29W60.8%22.3%85.2%7.8%
2025-12-0665.1%14.6%72.3%12.9%
2025-12-13L31.9%54.6%84.4%4.9%
2025-12-2025.8%31.5%L90.9%3.4%
2025-12-2743.9%36.6%67.6%23.3%
2026-01-0351.2%25%87%4.1%
2026-01-1063.9%22.8%85.5%8.1%
2026-01-1747.1%31%68.4%5.3%
Reactions from that night · Oct 11
Boise State

Way to go Coach Kellen Moore! ⚜️ 🙌

positiveCoachingFacebook

Banks is out? That should improve our secondary right there.

positiveInjuriesFacebook
New Mexico

Need to Lasso them Broncos and ride them hard and put them back with the fake PAC 10. !

positiveOpponent HostilityFacebook

This is business!!!! Stuff the Bronkos , they are full of horse hockey!!!!

positiveOpponent HostilityFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Boise StateNew Mexico
Harm · BSU +67 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · BSU +53 ptsOff-Field Storylines · BSU +86 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · UNM +3 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Boise State Harm: 73rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State Identity-Based Abuse: 81st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State Explicit Language: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State College Sports: 78th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State Off-Field Storylines: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State Sports Betting: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Boise State Team & Front Office: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • New Mexico Harm: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • New Mexico Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico College Sports: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • New Mexico Off-Field Storylines: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • New Mexico Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • New Mexico Team & Front Office: 57th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Boise State's positive share was higher in 0 of 22 shared weeks, New Mexico's in 22.

BSUUNM
0%47%94%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BSU, UNM
Week ofBSUUNMComments
2025-08-2336.8%77.6%3,043
2025-08-3042.8%79.6%1,290
2025-09-0655.3%92.1%962
2025-09-1368%85.9%845
2025-09-2059.4%78.4%850
2025-09-2765.3%82.5%1,007
2025-10-0439%67.8%1,907
2025-10-1153.3%84.7%804
2025-10-1874.7%80.7%1,421
2025-10-2549.1%85.8%1,211
2025-11-0131.3%93.8%2,271
2025-11-0846.7%80.3%706
2025-11-1530.7%82.9%1,938
2025-11-2253.2%89.6%1,954
2025-11-2960.8%85.2%3,597
2025-12-0665.1%72.3%2,735
2025-12-1331.9%84.4%1,528
2025-12-2025.8%90.9%991
2025-12-2743.9%67.6%445
2026-01-0351.2%87%287
2026-01-1063.9%85.5%439
2026-01-1747.1%68.4%299
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.