Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Ball State
Cardinals
vs
Big Ten
Purdue
Boilermakers
On the field
Purdue won 310 on Aug 30.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
BALL sentiment · 818 comments
Positive73.7%
Neutral7.3%
Negative17.6%
Mixed1.3%
PUR sentiment · 6,141 comments
Positive53.9%
Neutral10.7%
Negative33.9%
Mixed1.5%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Ball State
Purdue

Fan Score

737.2 (better)
538.5

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

73.7% (better)
53.9%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Ball State
Purdue

Negativity

176 (better)
339

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

20.8 (better)
25.4

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

20.8
(better)13.4

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Ball State left, Purdue right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Ball State
Purdue

Betting talk

7.3
4.1

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

44
142.5

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

2.4
16.8

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Ball State up, Purdue down
Ball State positive ↑Purdue positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
BALL 0PUR 31
Ball State had the happier comment section in 16 of 20 shared weeks, Purdue in 4. When they met on Aug 30, Purdue won 31–0; Purdue’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Ball State and Purdue
Week ofBall State resultBall State positive shareBall State negative sharePurdue resultPurdue positive sharePurdue negative share
2025-08-2386.2%6.9%69.7%23.4%
2025-08-30L60.5%25%W80.2%10.8%
2025-09-06L80.4%11.6%W70.1%14.7%
2025-09-13W86.4%5.7%L55.8%24.6%
2025-09-20L54.8%32.3%L57.1%33.6%
2025-09-2775%25%80.6%8.3%
2025-10-04W79.2%11.3%L57.6%30.8%
2025-10-11L75.9%17.2%L52.1%40.3%
2025-10-18W78.4%9.8%L39%49.2%
2025-10-25L39.1%43.5%L33.5%56%
2025-11-01W50%42.6%L60.9%27.9%
2025-11-0860.7%35.7%L52.1%40.7%
2025-11-15L61.3%22.6%L30.1%55.9%
2025-11-22L73.7%21.1%L36.3%48%
2025-11-29L71.9%28.1%53.3%33.6%
2025-12-0694.1%0%51.9%25%
2025-12-13100%0%24.2%60.2%
2025-12-20100%0%42.2%51.7%
2025-12-2766.4%24.8%
2026-01-03100%0%73.3%18.3%
2026-01-10100%0%58.5%22.6%
2026-01-1718.5%70.4%
Reactions from that night · Aug 30
Ball State

Be there tomorrow let’s gooooo

positiveCrowd & AttendanceFacebook

Purdue favored by 17.5 and the BSU win total for the season is 3.5. Let's shock the world and prove everyone wrong! Chirp chirp!

positiveGamblingFacebook
Purdue

Need to crush BSU to send a message. Do the same against SIU. And quit playing programs like this in the future. No upside to doing this.

positiveOpponent HostilityFacebook

Looks like they are correcting that issue from last year where there was no contrast in color between the end zone and out of bounds. 👍🏻

positiveStadium ExperienceFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Ball StatePurdue
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Ball State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Purdue Harm: 40th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue Identity-Based Abuse: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue Explicit Language: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue College Sports: 79th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue Off-Field Storylines: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue Sports Betting: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Purdue Team & Front Office: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Ball State's positive share was higher in 16 of 20 shared weeks, Purdue's in 4.

BALLPUR
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BALL, PUR
Week ofBALLPURComments
2025-08-2386.2%69.7%259
2025-08-3060.5%80.2%657
2025-09-0680.4%70.1%567
2025-09-1386.4%55.8%559
2025-09-2054.8%57.1%418
2025-09-2775%80.6%156
2025-10-0479.2%57.6%330
2025-10-1175.9%52.1%413
2025-10-1878.4%39%346
2025-10-2539.1%33.5%375
2025-11-0150%60.9%402
2025-11-0860.7%52.1%168
2025-11-1561.3%30.1%330
2025-11-2273.7%36.3%702
2025-11-2971.9%53.3%634
2025-12-0694.1%51.9%69
2025-12-13100%24.2%130
2025-12-20100%42.2%154
2025-12-270%66.4%137
2026-01-03100%73.3%71
2026-01-10100%58.5%55
2026-01-170%18.5%27
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.