Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Ball State
Cardinals
vs
MAC
Eastern Michigan
Eagles
On the field
Eastern Michigan won 249 on Nov 15.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
BALL sentiment · 818 comments
Positive73.7%
Neutral7.3%
Negative17.6%
Mixed1.3%
EMU sentiment · 67 comments
Positive61.2%
Neutral11.9%
Negative25.4%
Mixed1.5%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Ball State
Eastern Michigan

Fan Score

737.2 (better)
611.9

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

73.7% (better)
61.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Ball State
Eastern Michigan

Negativity

176 (better)
253.7

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

20.8 (better)
29.9

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

20.8
(better)0

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Ball State left, Eastern Michigan right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Ball State
Eastern Michigan

Betting talk

7.3
0

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

44
268.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

2.4
14.9

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Ball State up, Eastern Michigan down
Ball State positive ↑Eastern Michigan positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
BALL 9EMU 24
Ball State had the happier comment section in 5 of 14 shared weeks, Eastern Michigan in 9. When they met on Nov 15, Eastern Michigan won 24–9; Ball State’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Ball State and Eastern Michigan
Week ofBall State resultBall State positive shareBall State negative shareEastern Michigan resultEastern Michigan positive shareEastern Michigan negative share
2025-08-2386.2%6.9%100%0%
2025-08-30L60.5%25%L100%0%
2025-09-06L80.4%11.6%L100%0%
2025-09-13W86.4%5.7%L0%100%
2025-09-20L54.8%32.3%W
2025-09-2775%25%L
2025-10-04W79.2%11.3%L100%0%
2025-10-11L75.9%17.2%W100%0%
2025-10-18W78.4%9.8%L50%50%
2025-10-25L39.1%43.5%L0%0%
2025-11-01W50%42.6%
2025-11-0860.7%35.7%W63.6%27.3%
2025-11-15L61.3%22.6%W52%32%
2025-11-22L73.7%21.1%L100%0%
2025-11-29L71.9%28.1%100%0%
2025-12-0694.1%0%71.4%14.3%
2025-12-13100%0%0%100%
2025-12-20100%0%
2025-12-27
2026-01-03100%0%
2026-01-10100%0%
2026-01-1720%40%
Reactions from that night · Nov 15
Ball State

Bring home the W cardinals...Chirp chirp

positiveFacebook

Good luck tomorrow Cards!!!

positiveFacebook
Eastern Michigan

Should’ve never fired Eric Roof…

negativeCoachingFacebook

Time to get someone local that has roots in the area that can bring some stability to the program.

positiveCoachingFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Ball StateEastern Michigan
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Ball State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Ball State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Eastern Michigan Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Ball State's positive share was higher in 6 of 14 shared weeks, Eastern Michigan's in 8.

BALLEMU
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BALL, EMU
Week ofBALLEMUComments
2025-08-2386.2%100%59
2025-08-3060.5%100%77
2025-09-0680.4%100%113
2025-09-1386.4%0%89
2025-09-2054.8%0%31
2025-09-2775%0%12
2025-10-0479.2%100%110
2025-10-1175.9%100%60
2025-10-1878.4%50%53
2025-10-2539.1%0%24
2025-11-0150%0%54
2025-11-0860.7%63.6%39
2025-11-1561.3%52%56
2025-11-2273.7%100%22
2025-11-2971.9%100%34
2025-12-0694.1%71.4%24
2025-12-13100%0%3
2025-12-20100%0%7
2025-12-270%0%0
2026-01-03100%0%11
2026-01-10100%0%2
2026-01-170%20%5
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.