Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Army left, Tulane right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Army result | Army positive share | Army negative share | Tulane result | Tulane positive share | Tulane negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | L | 87.5% | 4.3% | – | 94% | 4% |
| 2025-08-30 | – | 44.3% | 35.3% | W | 87.7% | 4.6% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 85% | 7.6% | W | 76.5% | 15% |
| 2025-09-13 | – | 88.8% | 2.2% | W | 85.2% | 7.3% |
| 2025-09-20 | L L | 56.9% | 34.1% | L | 64.3% | 28.3% |
| 2025-09-27 | – | 67.5% | 21.1% | W | 90.3% | 3% |
| 2025-10-04 | W | 93.5% | 2.9% | W | 67.1% | 21.8% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 85.3% | 6% | – | 74.8% | 14.5% |
| 2025-10-18 | L | 77.8% | 15.3% | W | 66.9% | 10% |
| 2025-10-25 | – | 90.3% | 7.8% | L | 64.6% | 24.4% |
| 2025-11-01 | W | 90% | 5.9% | W | 67.7% | 19.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | W | 73.1% | 13.6% | – | 73.6% | 12.7% |
| 2025-11-15 | – | 77.1% | 12.2% | W | 80.2% | 10.4% |
| 2025-11-22 | L | 45.4% | 47% | W | 77.7% | 12.7% |
| 2025-11-29 | W | 83.4% | 12.5% | W W | 72.7% | 15.4% |
| 2025-12-06 | – | 71.6% | 21.6% | – | 65.1% | 24.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | L | 55.6% | 33.6% | – | 80.3% | 11.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 90.5% | 3.3% | L | 50.9% | 42.1% |
| 2025-12-27 | W | 86.1% | 8.5% | – | 73.7% | 10.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 57.1% | 27.6% | – | 66.7% | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 74.7% | 16.8% | – | 48.2% | 33.9% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 68.3% | 22% | – | 54.1% | 31.1% |
“Tarleton State...🤣 GO NAVY!!! BEAT ARMY!!!🐏”
“GAMEDAY.IS INTERVIEWING PENN STATE'S RECENTLY DEPARTED HEAD COACH JAMES FRANKLIN THIS MORNING! 🏈”
“Loving da soundtracks. Media dept killing it 👍🏽💯”
“here's the link for the streamd: https://combet.king-cpasports.com/hsfootball.php”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Army Harm: 1st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Army Identity-Based Abuse: 17th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Army Explicit Language: 28th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Army College Sports: 1st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Army Off-Field Storylines: 14th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Army Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
- Army Team & Front Office: 59th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tulane Harm: 47th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tulane Identity-Based Abuse: 34th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tulane Explicit Language: 66th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tulane College Sports: 17th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tulane Off-Field Storylines: 20th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tulane Sports Betting: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Tulane Team & Front Office: 35th percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Army's positive share was higher in 13 of 22 shared weeks, Tulane's in 9.
| Week of | ARMY | TULN | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 87.5% | 94% | 354 |
| 2025-08-30 | 44.3% | 87.7% | 1,059 |
| 2025-09-06 | 85% | 76.5% | 1,578 |
| 2025-09-13 | 88.8% | 85.2% | 570 |
| 2025-09-20 | 56.9% | 64.3% | 884 |
| 2025-09-27 | 67.5% | 90.3% | 350 |
| 2025-10-04 | 93.5% | 67.1% | 640 |
| 2025-10-11 | 85.3% | 74.8% | 546 |
| 2025-10-18 | 77.8% | 66.9% | 2,576 |
| 2025-10-25 | 90.3% | 64.6% | 817 |
| 2025-11-01 | 90% | 67.7% | 801 |
| 2025-11-08 | 73.1% | 73.6% | 1,906 |
| 2025-11-15 | 77.1% | 80.2% | 1,099 |
| 2025-11-22 | 45.4% | 77.7% | 1,319 |
| 2025-11-29 | 83.4% | 72.7% | 2,219 |
| 2025-12-06 | 71.6% | 65.1% | 4,080 |
| 2025-12-13 | 55.6% | 80.3% | 1,330 |
| 2025-12-20 | 90.5% | 50.9% | 1,356 |
| 2025-12-27 | 86.1% | 73.7% | 1,315 |
| 2026-01-03 | 57.1% | 66.7% | 248 |
| 2026-01-10 | 74.7% | 48.2% | 151 |
| 2026-01-17 | 68.3% | 54.1% | 115 |