Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

SEC
Arkansas
Razorbacks
vs
Sun Belt
UL Monroe
Warhawks
ARK sentiment · 44,286 comments
Positive33.2%
Neutral10.1%
Negative54.6%
Mixed2%
ULM sentiment · 943 comments
Positive74.1%
Neutral11.8%
Negative12.3%
Mixed1.8%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Arkansas
UL Monroe

Fan Score

331.6
(better)741.3

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

33.2%
(better)74.1%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Arkansas
UL Monroe

Negativity

546.5
(better)123

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

58.2
(better)11.7

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

43.1
(better)5.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Arkansas left, UL Monroe right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Arkansas
UL Monroe

Betting talk

3.6
0

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

212.2
83.8

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

18
6.4

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Arkansas up, UL Monroe down
Arkansas positive ↑UL Monroe positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Arkansas had the happier comment section in 1 of 22 shared weeks, UL Monroe in 21.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Arkansas and UL Monroe
Week ofArkansas resultArkansas positive shareArkansas negative shareUL Monroe resultUL Monroe positive shareUL Monroe negative share
2025-08-2365.5%15.2%W76.8%4.2%
2025-08-30W56.8%30.9%78.5%6.3%
2025-09-06W45.4%37%L84%8%
2025-09-13L30.3%58.5%81.8%9.1%
2025-09-20L14.7%77.5%W82.4%4.5%
2025-09-27L19.8%71.7%W88.4%5.4%
2025-10-0447%37.8%L80.4%15.2%
2025-10-11L46.4%42%L47.6%11.9%
2025-10-18L38.9%45.3%L48%24%
2025-10-25L23.3%66.5%L70.8%16.7%
2025-11-01L16.9%73.8%L47.5%35.6%
2025-11-0835.9%49.7%66.7%0%
2025-11-15L21%67.3%L30.8%57.7%
2025-11-22L33%55.3%L48.9%37.8%
2025-11-29L36.8%51.5%L61.9%16.7%
2025-12-0636.3%47%100%0%
2025-12-1334.9%51%100%0%
2025-12-2047.6%36.2%100%0%
2025-12-2756.4%33.7%100%0%
2026-01-0353.4%30.2%83.3%16.7%
2026-01-1048.4%27.2%80%0%
2026-01-1738.4%42.3%0%100%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

ArkansasUL Monroe
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Arkansas Harm: 86th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas Identity-Based Abuse: 91st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas Explicit Language: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas College Sports: 94th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas Off-Field Storylines: 79th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas Sports Betting: 65th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas Team & Front Office: 94th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UL Monroe Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Arkansas's positive share was higher in 1 of 22 shared weeks, UL Monroe's in 21.

ARKULM
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: ARK, ULM
Week ofARKULMComments
2025-08-2365.5%76.8%443
2025-08-3056.8%78.5%1,333
2025-09-0645.4%84%2,050
2025-09-1330.3%81.8%1,128
2025-09-2014.7%82.4%3,938
2025-09-2719.8%88.4%3,552
2025-10-0447%80.4%316
2025-10-1146.4%47.6%1,529
2025-10-1838.9%48%2,431
2025-10-2523.3%70.8%2,388
2025-11-0116.9%47.5%2,180
2025-11-0835.9%66.7%474
2025-11-1521%30.8%2,116
2025-11-2233%48.9%1,888
2025-11-2936.8%61.9%14,270
2025-12-0636.3%100%1,239
2025-12-1334.9%100%1,309
2025-12-2047.6%100%300
2025-12-2756.4%100%111
2026-01-0353.4%83.3%843
2026-01-1048.4%80%955
2026-01-1738.4%0%436
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.