Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

Sun Belt
Arkansas State
Red Wolves
vs
SEC
Auburn
Tigers
ARST sentiment · 3,373 comments
Positive71.8%
Neutral11%
Negative16%
Mixed1.2%
AUB sentiment · 59,608 comments
Positive55.4%
Neutral9.3%
Negative33.6%
Mixed1.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Arkansas State
Auburn

Fan Score

717.8 (better)
554.1

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

71.8% (better)
55.4%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Arkansas State
Auburn

Negativity

160.1 (better)
336.1

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

11.3 (better)
34.6

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

2.1 (better)
7.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

0.6Race0.9
0.3Gender1.2
0.3Age0.8

Arkansas State left, Auburn right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Arkansas State
Auburn

Betting talk

1.8
2.4

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

105.2
182.8

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.4
9.9

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Arkansas State up, Auburn down
Arkansas State positive ↑Auburn positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Arkansas State had the happier comment section in 17 of 22 shared weeks, Auburn in 5.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Arkansas State and Auburn
Week ofArkansas State resultArkansas State positive shareArkansas State negative shareAuburn resultAuburn positive shareAuburn negative share
2025-08-2376.7%2.3%W72.7%14%
2025-08-30W70.6%18.9%73.4%16.8%
2025-09-06L57.9%32.1%W74.4%15.5%
2025-09-13L62.9%28.2%W72.1%18.3%
2025-09-20L47.9%45%L44.9%44.8%
2025-09-27L49.6%44.6%L27.8%63.1%
2025-10-04W81.8%9.8%51.8%34.6%
2025-10-11W65.1%21%L36.2%54.2%
2025-10-1888%0%L32.8%56.5%
2025-10-25W70.6%12.7%W65.7%27%
2025-11-01W70.7%2.5%L31.8%55.8%
2025-11-08L83.1%10.3%L66.3%25.5%
2025-11-15L50%36.9%61.4%21.8%
2025-11-2287.5%6.3%W72.7%16.3%
2025-11-29W76.3%14.8%L50.9%37.2%
2025-12-0683.7%2.3%61.7%24.8%
2025-12-13W91.8%1.1%61.6%27.4%
2025-12-2094%1.5%62.4%26.7%
2025-12-2796.2%0%63.4%24.9%
2026-01-0354.9%40.2%70.4%16.4%
2026-01-1063.1%6.3%68.5%16.2%
2026-01-1798.4%0.8%52.1%33.2%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

Arkansas StateAuburn
Harm · AUB +46 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · ARST +12 ptsOff-Field Storylines · AUB +31 ptsSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · AUB +58 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Arkansas State Harm: 8th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Arkansas State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Arkansas State College Sports: 66th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas State Off-Field Storylines: 62nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Arkansas State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Arkansas State Team & Front Office: 29th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Harm: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Identity-Based Abuse: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Explicit Language: 16th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn College Sports: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Off-Field Storylines: 93rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Sports Betting: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Auburn Team & Front Office: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Arkansas State's positive share was higher in 16 of 22 shared weeks, Auburn's in 6.

ARSTAUB
0%49%98%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: ARST, AUB
Week ofARSTAUBComments
2025-08-2376.7%72.7%943
2025-08-3070.6%73.4%2,752
2025-09-0657.9%74.4%2,382
2025-09-1362.9%72.1%2,382
2025-09-2047.9%44.9%3,393
2025-09-2749.6%27.8%3,447
2025-10-0481.8%51.8%1,776
2025-10-1165.1%36.2%4,049
2025-10-1888%32.8%2,625
2025-10-2570.6%65.7%2,812
2025-11-0170.7%31.8%3,124
2025-11-0883.1%66.3%3,828
2025-11-1550%61.4%829
2025-11-2287.5%72.7%6,552
2025-11-2976.3%50.9%13,997
2025-12-0683.7%61.7%2,497
2025-12-1391.8%61.6%1,149
2025-12-2094%62.4%378
2025-12-2796.2%63.4%231
2026-01-0354.9%70.4%2,137
2026-01-1063.1%68.5%1,023
2026-01-1798.4%52.1%675
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.